Ky. Rev. Stat. § 31.200

Repealed, 2002

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Expenses chargeable to county and to public advocate. History: Repealed 2002 Ky. Acts ch. 283, sec. 20, effective July 15, 2002. -- Amended 1998 Ky. Acts ch. 491, sec. 6, effective July 15, 1998. -- Amended 1994 Ky. Acts ch. 395, sec. 5, effective July 15, 1994. -- Amended 1978 Ky. Acts ch. 155, sec. 36, effective June 17, 1978. -- Amended 1976 Ky. Acts ch. 177, sec. 7. -- Amended 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 358, sec. 12. -- Created 1972 Ky. Acts ch. 353, sec. 20.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1984–2019 · leading case: McCracken County Fiscal Court v. Graves
McCracken County Fiscal Court v. Graves (1994) ky · cites it 15× “KRS 31.200 is entitled, “Expenses chargeable to county and to public advocate.”
Lincoln County Fiscal Court v. Department of Public Advocacy (1990) ky · cites it 17× “This approach disregards the language in subsection (1) KRS 31.200, which was not changed, specifying that "any direct expense,.”
Kordenbrock v. Commonwealth (1985) ky · cites it 4× “KRS 31.200(1) provides that any direct expense incurred in representing an indigent "is a charge against the county on behalf of which the service is performed.”
Harper v. Commonwealth (1998) ky · cites it 2× “185, and KRS 31.200. Appellant goes so far as to speculate that if counsel's failure to obtain expert assistance was due to lack of funds because Appellant had not paid him, then a conflict of interest existed between Appellant and trial counsel, thus denying Appellant effective…”
Perry County Fiscal Court v. Commonwealth (1984) ky “It is clear that the trial court may authorize the payment of fees for necessary expert witnesses by the county, not the Department of Public Advocacy, in all counties unless the circumstances are such that K.”
Lara Paige Conley v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (2019) ky “185 and KRS 31.200). Based upon the extraordinary circumstances of this case, it was evident from the outset that Conley’s sanity at the time of the offense had the potential to be a significant factor at trial, and thus it was the trial court’s duty to assure Conley had access…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 31.200(1) — 3 cases
Kordenbrock v. Commonwealth (1985) ky “KRS 31.200(1) provides that any direct expense incurred in representing an indigent "is a charge against the county on behalf of which the service is performed.”
McCracken County Fiscal Court v. Graves (1994) ky “KRS 31.200 is entitled, “Expenses chargeable to county and to public advocate.”
Lincoln County Fiscal Court v. Department of Public Advocacy (1990) ky “This approach disregards the language in subsection (1) KRS 31.200, which was not changed, specifying that "any direct expense,.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 31.200(3) — 3 cases
Lincoln County Fiscal Court v. Department of Public Advocacy (1990) ky “This approach disregards the language in subsection (1) KRS 31.200, which was not changed, specifying that "any direct expense,.”
McCracken County Fiscal Court v. Graves (1994) ky “KRS 31.200 is entitled, “Expenses chargeable to county and to public advocate.”
Perry County Fiscal Court v. Commonwealth (1984) ky “It is clear that the trial court may authorize the payment of fees for necessary expert witnesses by the county, not the Department of Public Advocacy, in all counties unless the circumstances are such that K.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.