Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 31

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 31.240

Repealed, 2002

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Compensation by counties of public advocates -- State contributions. History: Repealed 2002 Ky. Acts ch. 283, sec. 20, effective July 15, 2002. -- Amended 1998 Ky. Acts ch. 491, sec. 7, effective July 15, 1998. -- Amended 1984 Ky. Acts ch. 111, sec. 171, effective July 13, 1984. -- Amended 1978 Ky. Acts ch. 155, sec. 38, effective June 17, 1978. -- Created 1972 Ky. Acts ch. 353, sec. 24.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1984–1994 · leading case: Pillersdorf v. Department of Public Advocacy
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Pillersdorf v. Department of Public Advocacy (1994) ky · cites it 6× “160 through KRS 31.240. With all such plans, the statute affirmatively invests administrative oversight authority in the DPA to review and then approve, deny, or modify the submitted plan.”
Boyle County Fiscal Court v. Shewmaker (1984) kyctapp “190 and KRS 31.240(3). Thereupon, the fiscal court unsuccessfully petitioned this Court for a Writ of Prohibition against the trial judge from enforcing the orders of June 8,1982, and June 16, 1982.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 31.240(1) — 1 case
Pillersdorf v. Department of Public Advocacy (1994) ky “160 through KRS 31.240. With all such plans, the statute affirmatively invests administrative oversight authority in the DPA to review and then approve, deny, or modify the submitted plan.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 31.240(3) — 2 cases
Pillersdorf v. Department of Public Advocacy (1994) ky “160 through KRS 31.240. With all such plans, the statute affirmatively invests administrative oversight authority in the DPA to review and then approve, deny, or modify the submitted plan.”
Boyle County Fiscal Court v. Shewmaker (1984) kyctapp “190 and KRS 31.240(3). Thereupon, the fiscal court unsuccessfully petitioned this Court for a Writ of Prohibition against the trial judge from enforcing the orders of June 8,1982, and June 16, 1982.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.