(1) Every employer shall keep a record of:
(a) The amount paid each pay period to each employee;
(b) The hours worked each day and each week by each employee; and
(c) Such other information as the commissioner requires.
(2) Such records shall be kept on file for at least one (1) year after entry. They shall be
open to the inspection and transcript of the commissioner or the commissioner's
authorized representative at any reasonable time, and every employer shall furnish
to the commissioner or the commissioner's authorized representative on demand a
sworn statement of them. The commissioner may require the statement to be upon
forms prescribed or approved by him or her.
Effective: July 15, 2010
History: Amended 2010 Ky. Acts ch. 24, sec. 1732, effective July 15, 2010. --
Amended 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 391, sec. 6. -- Amended 1966 Ky. Acts ch. 158, sec. 6. -
- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat.
sec. 4767a-13.
Notes of Decisions
The Sullivan Univ. Sys., Inc. v. Mary E. McCann (Ky. Ct. App. 2020).
· cites it 2× “285(1); and (3) Sullivan violated the record keeping requirements with respect to hours worked in violation of KRS § 337.320. R. at 375. Additionally, the circuit court found all class members sought “the same category of remedies: backpay from February 2005 to August 20093 in…”
Rebollar v. DBC Food LLC 2 (W.D. Ky. 2021).
· cites it 2× “Finally, both parties’ motions for summary judgment on claims under KRS 337.320 fail as well. Pls.’ Mot. Partial Summ.”
Cabe v. Kitchen, 415 S.W.2d 96 (Ky. Ct. App. 1967).
· cites it 2× “The basis of their refusal was that KRS 337.320 only requires employment records for women or minors to “be kept on file for at least one year after entry.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 337.320(2) — 1 case
Cabe v. Kitchen, 415 S.W.2d 96 (Ky. Ct. App. 1967).
“The basis of their refusal was that KRS 337.320 only requires employment records for women or minors to “be kept on file for at least one year after entry.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.