Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 341.430 (2026)

Review by commission

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) The commission may on its own motion affirm, modify, or set aside any decision of a referee on the basis of the evidence previously submitted in such case, or direct the taking of additional evidence, or may permit any of the parties to such decision to initiate further appeals before it. The commission may remove to itself or transfer to another referee the proceedings on any claims pending before a referee. (2) An application for review by the commission of any administrative determination affecting an employing unit's liability, contribution rate, or amount of contributions may be filed by such employing unit within twenty (20) days after notice of such determination was mailed to such employing unit's last known address. (3) Any proceedings before the commission shall be heard and determined by the entire commission composed of three (3) members, except that no member of the commission shall participate in any case in which he is an interested party, and the chairman shall act alone in the absence or disqualification of any other member. The commission shall promptly notify the parties to any proceedings of its findings and decisions. Effective: July 15, 1988 History: Amended 1988 Ky. Acts ch. 106, sec. 10, effective July 15, 1988. -- Amended 1950 Ky. Acts ch. 206, sec. 1. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 4748g-11.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1943–2024 · leading case: Burch v. Taylor Drug Store, Inc., 965 S.W.2d 830 (Ky. Ct. App. 1998).
Burch v. Taylor Drug Store, Inc., 965 S.W.2d 830 (Ky. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 3× “” KRS 341.430(1). Unlike a conventional appellate body, the Commission conducts a de novo review of applications.”
Thompson v. Kentucky Unemployment Ins. Comm'n, 85 S.W.3d 621 (Ky. Ct. App. 2002). “See KRS 341.430(1). 5 . KRS 341.450. 6 . See American Beauty Homes Corp.”
Miller v. Kentucky Unemployment Ins. Comm'n, 425 S.W.3d 92 (Ky. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 4× “” KRS 341.430(1). Unlike a conventional appellate body, the Commission conducts a de novo review of applications.”
Kentucky Unemployment Ins. Comm'n v. Providian Agency Grp., Inc., 981 S.W.2d 138 (Ky. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “Any decision affecting an employing unit’s liability, contribution rate, or amount of contributions arises under KRS 341.430(2). KRS 341.450 and KRS 341.460 outline the appropriate procedures for judicial review of these decisions.”
Brown Hotel Co. v. Edwards, 365 S.W.2d 299 (Ky. Ct. App. 1962). “KRS 341.430. The Commission is authorized by statute to make regulations to provide for the conduct of hearings in a summary manner and for the presentation of appeals.”
W. Kentucky Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Runyon, 410 S.W.3d 113 (Ky. 2013). “The Commission’s Order We next turn to the merits of the Commission’s order.”
Kentucky Unemployment Comp. Comm'n v. Chenault & Orear, 174 S.W.2d 767 (Ky. Ct. App. 1943). “It is the argument of the appellees that no appeal is granted to the Commission from a referee’s decision as a matter of right, but that, by KRS 341.430, the setting aside of a referee’s decision by the Commission is made to depend on the whim, fairness or desire of the…”
Kentucky Unemployment Ins. Comm'n v. Blakeman, 419 S.W.3d 752 (Ky. Ct. App. 2013). “A court may not substitute its opinion as to the credibility of the witnesses, the weight given the evidence, or the inferences to be drawn from the evidence.”
Muhammad v. Cont'l Mills, Inc (W.D. Ky. 2024). · cites it 2× “See Ky. Rev. Stat. § 341.430. From there, judicial review may be had in the circuit court of the county where the claimant was employed under Ky.”
Marcia Ebbs, M.D. v. Kentucky Unemployment Ins. Comm'n (Ky. Ct. App. 2020). “See also KRS 341.430(1). We conclude that the Referee and the Commission were entitled to base their findings of disqualification on [the employee’s] conduct, rather than merely the specific rules cited by the [employer] as a basis for his termination.”
Stephen S. Willis v. Kentucky Unemployment Ins. Comm'n (Ky. Ct. App. 2021). “115 and KRS 341.430. The referee conducting the additional evidentiary hearings for KUIC explained on the record that he would simply be conducting the evidentiary hearings and then submitting the evidence to KUIC for it to review.”
Desiree Bailey v. Kentucky Unemployent Ins. Comm'n (Ky. Ct. App. 2023). “” Additionally, pursuant to 787 KAR 1:110 Section 4(3)(a), “[t]he commission may direct that any hearing be conducted on its behalf by an authorized representative.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 341.430(1) — 6 cases
Burch v. Taylor Drug Store, Inc., 965 S.W.2d 830 (Ky. Ct. App. 1998). “” KRS 341.430(1). Unlike a conventional appellate body, the Commission conducts a de novo review of applications.”
Thompson v. Kentucky Unemployment Ins. Comm'n, 85 S.W.3d 621 (Ky. Ct. App. 2002). “See KRS 341.430(1). 5 . KRS 341.450. 6 . See American Beauty Homes Corp.”
Miller v. Kentucky Unemployment Ins. Comm'n, 425 S.W.3d 92 (Ky. Ct. App. 2013). “” KRS 341.430(1). Unlike a conventional appellate body, the Commission conducts a de novo review of applications.”
W. Kentucky Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Runyon, 410 S.W.3d 113 (Ky. 2013). “The Commission’s Order We next turn to the merits of the Commission’s order.”
Kentucky Unemployment Ins. Comm'n v. Blakeman, 419 S.W.3d 752 (Ky. Ct. App. 2013). “A court may not substitute its opinion as to the credibility of the witnesses, the weight given the evidence, or the inferences to be drawn from the evidence.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 341.430(2) — 1 case
Kentucky Unemployment Ins. Comm'n v. Providian Agency Grp., Inc., 981 S.W.2d 138 (Ky. Ct. App. 1998). “Any decision affecting an employing unit’s liability, contribution rate, or amount of contributions arises under KRS 341.430(2). KRS 341.450 and KRS 341.460 outline the appropriate procedures for judicial review of these decisions.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 341.430(3) — 1 case
Desiree Bailey v. Kentucky Unemployent Ins. Comm'n (Ky. Ct. App. 2023). “” Additionally, pursuant to 787 KAR 1:110 Section 4(3)(a), “[t]he commission may direct that any hearing be conducted on its behalf by an authorized representative.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.