Ky. Rev. Stat. § 369.109

Attribution and effect of electronic record and electronic signature

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) An electronic record or electronic signature is attributable to a person if it was the act of the person. The act of the person may be shown in any manner, including a showing of the efficacy of any security procedure applied to determine the person to which the electronic record or electronic signature was attributable. (2) The effect of an electronic record or electronic signature attributed to a person under subsection (1) of this section is determined from the context and surrounding circumstances at the time of its creation, execution, or adoption, including the parties' agreement, if any, and otherwise as provided by law. Effective: August 1, 2000 History: Created 2000 Ky. Acts ch. 301, sec. 9, effective August 1, 2000.

Notes of Decisions
Tax Recall Petition Committee, Acting by and Through Its Members And Bobbie Holsclaw, in Her Official Capacity as Jeffer (2022) ky · cites it 5× “20 KRS 369.109. 21 KRS 369.106(1). 13 the UETA.”
Jarred Farnham v. Campari America, LLC, et al. (2025) kyed · cites it 2× “8, 2016) (“A party meets the prima facie burden of establishing an arbitration agreement by providing copies of a written and signed agreement to arbitrate.”
Andrew W. Dusing v. Triple Crown Developers, LLC (2026) kyctapp “Per KRS 369.109(2), the effect of a contested electronic record or signature must be determined from analyzing the context and surrounding circumstances at the time of its creation, execution, or adoption.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 369.109(1) — 2 cases
Jarred Farnham v. Campari America, LLC, et al. (2025) kyed “8, 2016) (“A party meets the prima facie burden of establishing an arbitration agreement by providing copies of a written and signed agreement to arbitrate.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 369.109(2) — 1 case
Andrew W. Dusing v. Triple Crown Developers, LLC (2026) kyctapp “Per KRS 369.109(2), the effect of a contested electronic record or signature must be determined from analyzing the context and surrounding circumstances at the time of its creation, execution, or adoption.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.