Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 378A
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 378A.005 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter may be cited as the Kentucky Uniform Voidable Transactions Act. Effective: January 1, 2016 History: Created 2015 Ky. Acts ch. 37, sec. 15, effective January 1, 2016.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2017–2026 · leading case: Spradlin ex rel. J.A.D. Coal Co. v. Pryor Cashman LLP (In re Licking River Mining, LLC), 565 B.R. 794 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Spradlin ex rel. J.A.D. Coal Co. v. Pryor Cashman LLP (In re Licking River Mining, LLC), 565 B.R. 794 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2017). · cites it 2× “Ky. Rev. Stat. §§ 378A.005 to .140. "No statute shall be construed to be retroactive, unless expressly so declared.”
Spradlin v. Monday Coal, LLC (In re Licking River Mining, LLC), 571 B.R. 241 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2017). · cites it 2× “Ky. Rev. Stat. §§ 378A.005 to ,140. "No statute shall be construed to be retroactive, unless expressly so declared.”
Spradlin v. E. Coast Miner, LLC (In re Licking River Mining, LLC), 603 B.R. 336 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2019). · cites it 2× “§§ 378A.005 to .140. Transfers "occurring prior to [the UVTA's] enactment must be considered under the repealed chapter 378, which was in effect at the time of the pertinent transfers.”
Spradlin ex rel. J.A.D. Coal Co. v. Wrigley's 7-711, Inc. (In re Licking River Mining, LLC), 572 B.R. 830 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2017). · cites it 2× “Ky. Rev. Stat. §§ 378A.005 to .140. “No statute shall be construed to be retroactive, unless express *842 ly so declared,” Ky.”
Spradlin v. Whitt (In re Licking River Mining, LLC), 572 B.R. 812 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2017). · cites it 2× “Ky. Rev. Stat. §§ 378A.005 to .140. "No statute shall be construed to be retroactive, unless expressly so declared.”
Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Cent. Kentucky Lodging, Inc. (E.D. Ky. 2021). · cites it 2× “breach of a duty of care imposed by Fayette County Ordinance 282-2005 § 3-28, and breach of a common law duty of care against ABDCO, Central Kentucky Lodging, Brian Dodge, and Nathan Dodge (Counts X through XIII and Count XV); breach of unspecified statutory duties of care…”
United States of Am. v. Michael S. Gainey, et al. (E.D. Ky. 2026). · cites it 2× “Kentucky’s Uniform Voidable Transaction Act, Ky. Rev. Stat. § 378A.005 et seq., lists several factors to consider when considering voiding a fraudulent transfer, including whether “the transfer was to an insider,” whether “the debtor retained possession or control of the…”
Daniel Popa v. Lucia Tiberia Popa (Ky. Ct. App. 2020). “Lucia and her associates sought to include in the amendment to their counterclaims a specific claim for relief under the provisions of the Voidable Transactions Act, KRS 378A.005, et seq. On May 3, 2018, the circuit court entered its findings of facts, conclusions of law, order,…”
Facilityone Tech., LLC v. Kinetic Props., Inc. (Ky. Ct. App. 2024). “Kinetic also sought to void the asset transfer from C2 to Facility One as a fraudulent attempt to avoid C2’s debt -3- obligations under the Kentucky Uniform Voidable Transactions Act, KRS 378A.005 et seq. Kinetic filed a motion for default judgment against C2 on May 15, 2019,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.