Catchline at repeal: Abatement of nuisance -- Exceptions -- Enforcement ordinance --
Lien -- Personal liability of property owner.
History: Repealed 2016 Ky. Acts ch. 86, sec. 18, effective January 1, 2017. --
Amended 2015 Ky. Acts ch. 19, sec. 43, effective June 24, 2015. -- Amended 2011
Ky. Acts ch. 95, sec. 10, effective June 8, 2011. -- Amended 2005 Ky. Acts ch. 179,
sec. 1, effective June 20, 2005. -- Amended 1990 Ky. Acts ch. 8, sec. 1, effective
July 13, 1990. -- Amended 1988 Ky. Acts ch. 298, sec. 1, effective July 15, 1988. --
Amended 1982 Ky. Acts ch. 145, sec. 3, effective July 15, 1982. -- Amended 1978
Ky. Acts ch. 384, sec. 509, effective June 17, 1978. -- Amended 1972 Ky. Acts ch.
108, sec. 1. -- Amended 1970 Ky. Acts ch. 99, sec. 1. -- Amended 1968 Ky. Acts ch.
10, sec. 1. -- Created 1956 Ky. Acts ch. 9, sec. 1.
Notes of Decisions
Duffy v. City of Stanton, Kentucky (2006)
kyed · cites it 5×
“KRS § 381.770 provides that "it shall be unlawful for the owner, occupant or person having control or management of any land within a city, .”
Ky. Tax Bill Servicing, Inc. v. City of Covington (2021)
kyed · cites it 29×
“Plaintiff asserts four claims under § 1983: (I) Violation of Procedural Due Process, (II) Substantive Due Process Violations, (III) Improper Taking Without Just Compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment, (IV) Equal Protection Violation; and two state law claims: (V)…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 381.770(2) — 1 case
Duffy v. City of Stanton, Kentucky (2006)
kyed
“KRS § 381.770 provides that "it shall be unlawful for the owner, occupant or person having control or management of any land within a city, .”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 381.770(5) — 1 case
Duffy v. City of Stanton, Kentucky (2006)
kyed
“KRS § 381.770 provides that "it shall be unlawful for the owner, occupant or person having control or management of any land within a city, .”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 381.770(6) — 1 case
Ky. Tax Bill Servicing, Inc. v. City of Covington (2021)
kyed
“Plaintiff asserts four claims under § 1983: (I) Violation of Procedural Due Process, (II) Substantive Due Process Violations, (III) Improper Taking Without Just Compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment, (IV) Equal Protection Violation; and two state law claims: (V)…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.