Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 396.075 (2026)

Payment of claims

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) Upon the expiration of six (6) months from the date of his appointment, the personal representative may proceed to pay the claims allowed against the estate in the order of priority prescribed, after making appropriate provision for exemptions and allowances provided by law, for claims already presented which have not yet been allowed and for unbarred claims which may yet be presented, including costs and expenses of administration. By petition to the court in a proceeding for the purpose, a claimant whose claim has been allowed but not paid as provided herein may secure an order directing the personal representative to pay the claim to the extent that funds of the estate are available for the payment. (2) The personal representative at any time may pay any just claim which has not been barred, with or without formal presentation, but he is personally liable to any other claimant whose claim is allowed and who is injured by such payment if: (a) The payment was made before the expiration of the time limit stated in subsection (1) of this section and the personal representative failed to require the payee to give adequate security for the refund of any of the payment necessary to pay other claimants; or (b) The payment was made, due to the negligence or willful fault of the personal representative, in such manner as to deprive the injured claimant of his priority. Effective: July 15, 1988 History: Created 1988 Ky. Acts ch. 90, sec. 13, effective July 15, 1988.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2003–2005 · leading case: DeMoisey v. River Downs Inv. Co., 159 S.W.3d 820 (Ky. Ct. App. 2005).
DeMoisey v. River Downs Inv. Co., 159 S.W.3d 820 (Ky. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 3× “Once the claim was allowed, it was payable under KRS 396.075, which provides that if an allowed claim is not paid, the claimant may apply to the court for an order directing the personal representative to satisfy the claim to the extent that funds in the estate are available.”
Patterson v. Est. of Boone, 150 S.W.3d 58 (Ky. Ct. App. 2003). “There is disagreement between the parties whether the district court found the claim barred as a matter of law because the estate failed to act within sixty days or, whether on the facts, it refused the petition because of the failure to show cause. The district court or *62 der…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 396.075(1) — 1 case
Patterson v. Est. of Boone, 150 S.W.3d 58 (Ky. Ct. App. 2003). “There is disagreement between the parties whether the district court found the claim barred as a matter of law because the estate failed to act within sixty days or, whether on the facts, it refused the petition because of the failure to show cause. The district court or *62 der…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.