Kentucky Revised Statutes
Ky. Rev. Stat. § 403.060 (2026)
Repealed, 1972
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Catchline at repeal: Disposition of property -- Restoration of maiden name. History: Repealed 1972 Ky. Acts ch. 182, sec. 29. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. secs. 2121, 2122, 2123.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 116
cases, 1942–2001 · leading case: Ping v. Denton, 562 S.W.2d 314 (Ky. 1978).
Ping v. Denton, 562 S.W.2d 314 (Ky. 1978). “The previous Kentucky cases held otherwise due to the restoration provisions of KRS 403.060 and 403.065, repealed June 16, 1972, and thus not applicable to this case.”
Travis v. Travis, 59 S.W.3d 904 (Ky. 2001). “" Thus, section 307(b)(5) did not provide for the creation of a marital interest in nonmarital property by "team efforts," or what the majority opinion in this case refers to as "sweat equity," but required the same result as had our interpretation of our former…”
Reed v. Reed, 457 S.W.2d 4 (Ky. Ct. App. 1970). “plus reimbursement of their out-of-office expenses, is reasonable and justified" as compensation for the services rendered to Jean by her attorneys and adjudged that Clyde should pay one-third of that fee and expenses.”
O'Nan v. Comm'r, 47 T.C. 648 (Tax Ct. 1967). “KRS 403.060 [2121; 2122; 2123] Disposition of property; restoration of maiden name.”
Colley v. Colley, 460 S.W.2d 821 (Ky. Ct. App. 1970). “The dissenting opinion in the Reed case traces the historical background of this legislative authorization for the granting of alimony.”
Beggs v. Beggs, 479 S.W.2d 598 (Ky. Ct. App. 1972). “Restoration of property is required by KRS 403.060 and 403.065. These statutes refer to gifts between the spouses and those received from others, inheritances and property owned at the time of the marriage.”
Bissell v. Gentry, 403 S.W.2d 15 (Ky. Ct. App. 1966). “*16 The judgment provided for restoration, under the provisions of KRS 403.060, by each to the other of property received one from the other and not otherwise disposed of at the commencement of the action.”
Angel v. Angel, 562 S.W.2d 661 (Ky. Ct. App. 1978). “Prior to the repeal of the restoration statutes (KRS 403.060 and 403.065) by the enactment of the present divorce act (1972 Ky.”
Carter v. Carter, 382 S.W.2d 400 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964). “KRS 403.060. The chancellor found the wife wholly at fault in causing the incompatability and found also that the parties had not accumulated any estate during the marriage.”
Kivett v. Kivett, 312 S.W.2d 884 (Ky. Ct. App. 1958). “” Webster’s New International Dictionary, Second Edition *888 It was the intent of the enactors of the statutes that the property of one party to a marriage obtained by the other party without valuable consideration or without any consideration other than by reason of the…”
Clark v. Clark, 425 S.W.2d 745 (Ky. Ct. App. 1968). “An equitable allowance out of the husband's estate is specifically authorized by KRS 403.060(1). In the present case the wife had no property of her own nor was she charged with moral delinquency.”
Barnett v. Barnett, 168 S.W.2d 17 (Ky. Ct. App. 1942). “The provision of Section 403.060, KB.S, is that: “If the wife have not sufficient estate of her own she may, on a divorce obtained by her, have such allowance out of that of her husband as shall be deemed equitable.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 403.060(1) — 20 cases
Colley v. Colley, 460 S.W.2d 821 (Ky. Ct. App. 1970). “The dissenting opinion in the Reed case traces the historical background of this legislative authorization for the granting of alimony.”
Reed v. Reed, 457 S.W.2d 4 (Ky. Ct. App. 1970). “plus reimbursement of their out-of-office expenses, is reasonable and justified" as compensation for the services rendered to Jean by her attorneys and adjudged that Clyde should pay one-third of that fee and expenses.”
Clark v. Clark, 425 S.W.2d 745 (Ky. Ct. App. 1968). “An equitable allowance out of the husband's estate is specifically authorized by KRS 403.060(1). In the present case the wife had no property of her own nor was she charged with moral delinquency.”
Beggs v. Beggs, 479 S.W.2d 598 (Ky. Ct. App. 1972). “Restoration of property is required by KRS 403.060 and 403.065. These statutes refer to gifts between the spouses and those received from others, inheritances and property owned at the time of the marriage.”
Gann v. Gann, 347 S.W.2d 540 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 403.060(2) — 27 cases
Beggs v. Beggs, 479 S.W.2d 598 (Ky. Ct. App. 1972). “Restoration of property is required by KRS 403.060 and 403.065. These statutes refer to gifts between the spouses and those received from others, inheritances and property owned at the time of the marriage.”
Kivett v. Kivett, 312 S.W.2d 884 (Ky. Ct. App. 1958). “” Webster’s New International Dictionary, Second Edition *888 It was the intent of the enactors of the statutes that the property of one party to a marriage obtained by the other party without valuable consideration or without any consideration other than by reason of the…”
Noel v. Noel, 210 S.W.2d 142 (Ky. Ct. App. 1947).
Bailey v. Bailey, 474 S.W.2d 389 (Ky. Ct. App. 1971).
Bissell v. Gentry, 403 S.W.2d 15 (Ky. Ct. App. 1966). “*16 The judgment provided for restoration, under the provisions of KRS 403.060, by each to the other of property received one from the other and not otherwise disposed of at the commencement of the action.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 403.060(4) — 3 cases
Peniston v. Peniston, 511 S.W.2d 675 (Ky. Ct. App. 1974).
Terrell v. Terrell, 352 S.W.2d 195 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961).
Phillips v. Phillips, 210 S.W.2d 756 (Ky. Ct. App. 1948).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.