Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 403
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 403.470 (2026)

Repealed, 2004

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Jurisdiction declined by reason of conduct. History: Repealed 2004 Ky. Acts ch. 133, sec. 46, effective July 13, 2004. -- Created 1980 Ky. Acts ch. 69, sec. 8, effective July 15, 1980.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1982–2020 · leading case: Wood v. Graham, 633 S.W.2d 404 (Ky. 1982).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wood v. Graham, 633 S.W.2d 404 (Ky. 1982). “KRS 403.470(2). Although the present statute was enacted in 1980, it is not too dissimilar to its predecessor, KRS 403.”
Green v. Bruenning, 690 S.W.2d 770 (Ky. Ct. App. 1985). “460 or KRS 403.470. Accordingly, the order of July 24, 1984, granting full faith and credit to the Texas decree provisions relating to custody and child support is reversed and the cause is remanded for a determination of custody, or for findings consistent with the views…”
Wieczorek v. Sebastian, 751 S.W.2d 38 (Ky. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “The Daviess Circuit Court’s jurisdiction to take any action in this matter is limited by KRS 403.470(2). That statute provides as follows: Unless required in the interest of the child, the court shall not exercise its jurisdiction to modify a custody decree of another state if…”
Pike v. Aigner, 828 S.W.2d 674 (Ky. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 7× “) The provisions of KRS 403.470 do not come into operation unless the court has jurisdiction under KRS 403.”
Alexandra Lawson v. Richard A. Woeste (Ky. 2020). “He argued that the trial court’s inaction violated KRS 403.470(4), which in 2009 limited the effectiveness of an emergency protective order to fourteen days.”
Rockwell v. Henning, 731 S.W.2d 11 (Ky. Ct. App. 1987). “KRS 403.470(2). In the case at bar, we have no evidence as to who the legal custodian became upon the death of the mother.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 403.470(2) — 4 cases
Wood v. Graham, 633 S.W.2d 404 (Ky. 1982). “KRS 403.470(2). Although the present statute was enacted in 1980, it is not too dissimilar to its predecessor, KRS 403.”
Wieczorek v. Sebastian, 751 S.W.2d 38 (Ky. Ct. App. 1988). “The Daviess Circuit Court’s jurisdiction to take any action in this matter is limited by KRS 403.470(2). That statute provides as follows: Unless required in the interest of the child, the court shall not exercise its jurisdiction to modify a custody decree of another state if…”
Pike v. Aigner, 828 S.W.2d 674 (Ky. Ct. App. 1992). “) The provisions of KRS 403.470 do not come into operation unless the court has jurisdiction under KRS 403.”
Rockwell v. Henning, 731 S.W.2d 11 (Ky. Ct. App. 1987). “KRS 403.470(2). In the case at bar, we have no evidence as to who the legal custodian became upon the death of the mother.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 403.470(4) — 1 case
Alexandra Lawson v. Richard A. Woeste (Ky. 2020). “He argued that the trial court’s inaction violated KRS 403.470(4), which in 2009 limited the effectiveness of an emergency protective order to fourteen days.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.