Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 423

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 423.140

Recognition of certificate of acknowledgment

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The form of a certificate of acknowledgment used by a person whose authority is recognized under KRS 423.110 shall be accepted in this state if: (1) The certificate is in a form prescribed by the laws or regulations of this state; (2) The certificate is in a form prescribed by the laws or regulations applicable in the place in which the acknowledgment is taken; or (3) The certificate contains the words "acknowledged before me," or their substantial equivalent. Effective: July 1, 1970 History: 1970 Ky. Acts ch. 131, sec. 4, effective July 1, 1970.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 2005–2011 · leading case: Matthews v. Commonwealth
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Matthews v. Commonwealth (2005) ky · cites it 2× “KRS 423.140, which governs the acceptance of certificates of acknowledgment performed outside of Kentucky, demonstrates that the term "acknowledgment" is intended to be an inclusive concept: The form of a certificate of acknowledgment used by a person whose authority is…”
Baker v. CIT Group/Consumer Finance Inc. (In Re Hastings) (2006) kyeb · cites it 3× “110 and KRS 423.140. KRS 423.110 provides in pertinent part as follows: For the purposes of KRS 423.”
Cit Group/Consumer Finance, In v. Beverly Burden, Trustee (2009) ca6 · cites it 4× “130 when read together with Ky. Rev. Stat. §§ 423.140 and 423.150;2 (3) Ky.”
Dunlap v. Commonwealth Community Bank (In Re Phelps) (2006) kywb · cites it 2× “KRS Section 423.140 provides as follows: The form of a certificate of acknowledgment used by a person whose authority is recognized under KRS 423.”
Rhiel v. Huntington National Bank (In Re Phalen) (2011) ohsb “In Wilson, the defendants/creditors argued, among other things, that “the notary statement that failed to name the individuals signing the Mortgage in the Certificate of Acknowledgment [did] comply with Ky.”
In re: Gruseck v. (2008) bap6 “” Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 423.140 (3) (emphasis added).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.