Ky. Rev. Stat. § 423.150

Certificate of acknowledgment

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The words "acknowledged before me" mean: (1) That the person acknowledging appeared before the person taking the acknowledgment; (2) That he acknowledged he executed the instrument; (3) That, in the case of: (a) A natural person, he executed the instrument for the purposes therein stated; (b) A corporation, the officer or agent acknowledged he held the position or title set forth in the instrument and certificate, he signed the instrument on behalf of the corporation by proper authority, and the instrument was the act of the corporation for the purpose therein stated; (c) A partnership, the partner or agent acknowledged he signed the instrument on behalf of the partnership by proper authority and he executed the instrument as the act of the partnership for the purpose therein stated; (d) A person acknowledging as principal by an attorney in fact, he executed the instrument by proper authority as the act of the principal for the purposes therein stated; (e) A person acknowledging as a public officer, trustee, administrator, guardian, or other representative, he signed the instrument by proper authority and he executed the instrument in the capacity and for the purposes therein stated; and (4) That the person taking the acknowledgment either knew or had satisfactory evidence that the person acknowledging was the person named in the instrument or certificate. Effective: July 1, 1970 History: Created 1970 Ky. Acts ch. 131, sec. 5, effective July 1, 1970.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 2005–2011 · leading case: Matthews v. Commonwealth

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Matthews v. Commonwealth (2005) ky · cites it 2× “"); KRS 423.150 ("Certificate of acknowledgment.”

Cit Group/Consumer Finance, In v. Beverly Burden, Trustee (2009) ca6 · cites it 4× “Further, they argue that if the Certificate of Acknowledgment contains that language, Ky. Rev. Stat. § 423.150 provides a “safe harbor” that excuses the notary from naming the person acknowledging the instrument when that person is named in the instrument.”

Rhiel v. Huntington National Bank (In Re Phalen) (2011) ohsb “The creditors in Wilson relied on the URAA definition of the phrase “acknowledged before me” as set forth in Ky.Rev.Stat. § 423.150, see id., which is identical to Ohio Revised Code § 147.”

Dunlap v. Commonwealth Community Bank (In Re Phelps) (2006) kywb “KRS 423.150 defines the words “acknowledged before me,” to mean: “(1) That the person acknowledging appeared before the person taking the acknowledgment; (2) That he acknowledged he executed the instrument; (3) That, in the case of: (a) A natural per *852 son, he executed the…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.