Ky. Rev. Stat. § 45A.343

Local public agency may adopt provisions of KRS 45A.345 to 45A.460 --

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Effect of adoption -- Contracts required to mandate revealing of violations of and compliance with specified KRS chapters -- Effect of nondisclosure or noncompliance. (1) Any local public agency may adopt the provisions of KRS 45A.345 to 45A.460. No other statutes governing purchasing shall apply to a local public agency upon adoption of these provisions. (2) After July 15, 1994, any contract entered into by a local public agency, whether under KRS 45A.345 to 45A.460 or any other authority, shall require the contractor and all subcontractors performing work under the contract to: (a) Reveal any final determination of a violation by the contractor or subcontractor within the previous five (5) year period pursuant to KRS Chapters 136, 139, 141, 337, 338, 341, and 342 that apply to the contractor or subcontractor; and (b) Be in continuous compliance with the provisions of KRS Chapters 136, 139, 141, 337, 338, 341, and 342 that apply to the contractor or subcontractor for the duration of the contract. (3) A contractor's failure to reveal a final determination of a violation by the contractor of KRS Chapters 136, 139, 141, 337, 338, 341, and 342 or to comply with these statutes for the duration of the contract shall be grounds for the local public agency's: (a) Cancellation of the contract; and (b) Disqualification of the contractor from eligibility for future contracts awarded by the local public agency for a period of two (2) years. (4) A subcontractor's failure to reveal a final determination of a violation by the subcontractor of KRS Chapters 136, 139, 141, 337, 338, 341, and 342 or to comply with these statutes for the duration of the contract shall be grounds for the local public agency's disqualification of the subcontractor from eligibility for future contracts for a period of two (2) years. Effective: July 15, 1998 History: Amended 1998 Ky. Acts ch. 520, sec. 2, effective July 15, 1998. -- Amended 1994 Ky. Acts ch. 491, sec. 2, effective July 15, 1994. -- Created 1980 Ky. Acts ch. 250, sec. 9, effective April 9, 1980.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1984–2025 · leading case: E.M. Bailey Distributing Co. v. Conagra, Inc.
E.M. Bailey Distributing Co. v. Conagra, Inc. (1984) ky “The Kentucky Model Procurement Code, KRS 45A, is not applicable to the riverport authority because neither the county, nor the authority, has adopted the provisions of the code required by KRS 45A.343. See Ohio River Conversions v.”
Laurel Construction Co. v. Paintsville Utility Commission (2010) kyctapp “ny official, board, agent, or other person appointed by the Commonwealth concerning any controversy arising under, or in connection with, the solicitation or award of a contract, shall be entitled to a presumption of correctness and shall not be disturbed unless the decision was…”
Board of Education of Paris, Kentucky v. Jason Earlywine (2025) ky · cites it 7× “345(4) (defining “construction” for KRS 45A.343 through KRS 45A.460). We next encounter this feature in KRS 45A.”
Community Services Project, Inc. v. Bawac Cleaning Services, Inc. (2007) kyctapp “Another portion, KRS 45A.343 to 45A.460, governs the parameters of a local public agency’s ability to enact a local procurement act.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 45A.343(1) — 2 cases
Laurel Construction Co. v. Paintsville Utility Commission (2010) kyctapp “ny official, board, agent, or other person appointed by the Commonwealth concerning any controversy arising under, or in connection with, the solicitation or award of a contract, shall be entitled to a presumption of correctness and shall not be disturbed unless the decision was…”
Board of Education of Paris, Kentucky v. Jason Earlywine (2025) ky “345(4) (defining “construction” for KRS 45A.343 through KRS 45A.460). We next encounter this feature in KRS 45A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.