(1) Any person may qualify to retire on disability, subject to the following
conditions:
(a) The person shall have sixty (60) months of service, twelve (12) of which
shall be current service credited under KRS 16.543(1), 61.543(1), or
78.615(1);
(b) For a person whose membership date is prior to August 1, 2004, the
person shall not be eligible for an unreduced retirement allowance;
(c) The person's application shall be on file in the retirement office no later
than twenty-four (24) months after the person's last day of paid
employment, as defined in KRS 61.510, in a regular full-time position, as
defined in KRS 61.510; and
(d) The person shall receive a satisfactory determination pursuant to KRS
61.665.
(2) A person's disability reapplication based on the same claim of incapacity shall
be accepted and reconsidered for disability if accompanied by new objective
medical evidence. The reapplication shall be on file in the retirement office no
later than twenty-four (24) months after the person's last day of paid
employment in a regular full-time position.
(3) Upon the examination of the objective medical evidence by licensed physicians
pursuant to KRS 61.665, it shall be determined that:
(a) The person, since his last day of paid employment, has been mentally or
physically incapacitated to perform the job, or jobs of like duties, from
which he received his last paid employment. In determining whether the
person may return to a job of like duties, any reasonable accommodation
by the employer as provided in 42 U.S.C. sec. 12111(9) and 29 C.F.R.
Part 1630 shall be considered;
(b) The incapacity is a result of bodily injury, mental illness, or disease. For
purposes of this section, "injury" means any physical harm or damage to
the human organism other than disease or mental illness;
(c) The incapacity is deemed to be permanent; and
(d) The incapacity does not result directly or indirectly from bodily injury,
mental illness, disease, or condition which pre-existed membership in the
system or the County Employees Retirement System or reemployment,
whichever is most recent. For purposes of this subsection, reemployment
shall not mean a change of employment between employers participating
in the retirement systems administered by the Kentucky Retirement
Systems or the County Employees Retirement System with no loss of
service credit.
(4) Paragraph (d) of subsection (3) of this section shall not apply if:
(a) The incapacity is a result of bodily injury, mental illness, disease, or
condition which has been substantially aggravated by an injury or
accident arising out of or in the course of employment; or
(b) The person has at least sixteen (16) years' current or prior service for
employment with employers participating in the retirement systems
administered by the Kentucky Retirement Systems or the County
Employees Retirement System.
(5) (a) 1. An incapacity shall be deemed to be permanent if it is expected to
result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of
not less than twelve (12) months from the person's last day of paid
employment in a regular full-time position.
2. The determination of a permanent incapacity shall be based on the
medical evidence contained in the member's file and the member's
residual functional capacity and physical exertion requirements.
(b) The person's residual functional capacity shall be the person's capacity
for work activity on a regular and continuing basis. The person's physical
ability shall be assessed in light of the severity of the person's physical,
mental, and other impairments. The person's ability to walk, stand, carry,
push, pull, reach, handle, and other physical functions shall be considered
with regard to physical impairments. The person's ability to understand,
remember, and carry out instructions and respond appropriately to
supervision, coworkers, and work pressures in a work setting shall be
considered with regard to mental impairments. Other impairments,
including skin impairments, epilepsy, visual sensory impairments, postural
and manipulative limitations, and environmental restrictions, shall be
considered in conjunction with the person's physical and mental
impairments to determine residual functional capacity.
(c) The person's physical exertion requirements shall be determined based
on the following standards:
1. Sedentary work shall be work that involves lifting no more than ten
(10) pounds at a time and occasionally lifting or carrying articles
such as large files, ledgers, and small tools. Although a sedentary
job primarily involves sitting, occasional walking and standing may
also be required in the performance of duties.
2. Light work shall be work that involves lifting no more than twenty
(20) pounds at a time with frequent lifting or carrying of objects
weighing up to ten (10) pounds. A job shall be in this category if
lifting is infrequently required but walking and standing are
frequently required, or if the job primarily requires sitting with
pushing and pulling of arm or leg controls. If the person has the
ability to perform substantially all of these activities, the person shall
be deemed capable of light work. A person deemed capable of light
work shall be deemed capable of sedentary work unless the person
has additional limitations such as the loss of fine dexterity or inability
to sit for long periods.
3. Medium work shall be work that involves lifting no more than fifty
(50) pounds at a time with frequent lifting or carrying of objects
weighing up to twenty-five (25) pounds. If the person is deemed
capable of medium work, the person shall be deemed capable of
light and sedentary work.
4. Heavy work shall be work that involves lifting no more than one
hundred (100) pounds at a time with frequent lifting or carrying of
objects weighing up to fifty (50) pounds. If the person is deemed
capable of heavy work, the person shall also be deemed capable of
medium, light, and sedentary work.
5. Very heavy work shall be work that involves lifting objects weighing
more than one hundred (100) pounds at a time with frequent lifting
or carrying of objects weighing fifty (50) or more pounds. If the
person is deemed capable of very heavy work, the person shall be
deemed capable of heavy, medium, light, and sedentary work.
Effective:April 1, 2021
History: Amended 2021 Ky. Acts ch. 102, sec. 61, effective April 1, 2021. --
Amended 2004 Ky. Acts ch. 36, sec. 15, effective July 13, 2004. -- Amended
2002 Ky. Acts ch. 52, sec. 25, effective July 15, 2002. -- Amended 2000 Ky.
Acts ch. 385, sec. 19, effective July 14, 2000. -- Amended 1998 Ky. Acts ch.
105, sec. 11, effective July 15, 1998. -- Amended 1996 Ky. Acts ch. 167, sec.
12, effective July 15, 1996. -- Amended 1994 Ky. Acts ch. 485, sec. 16, effective
July 15, 1994. Amended 1992 Ky. Acts ch. 240, sec. 30, effective July 14,
1992. -- Amended 1990 Ky. Acts ch. 346, sec. 5, effective July 13, 1990. --
Amended 1988 Ky. Acts ch. 349, sec. 19, effective July 15, 1988; and ch. 387,
sec. 1, effective July 15, 1988. -- Amended 1984 Ky. Acts ch. 232, sec. 6,
effective July 13, 1984. -- Amended 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 128, sec. 20, effective
March 26, 1974. -- Amended 1972 Ky. Acts ch. 116, sec. 37. -- Amended 1970
Ky. Acts ch. 101, sec. 5. -- Amended 1966 Ky. Acts ch. 35, sec. 9. -- Amended
1962 Ky. Acts ch. 58, sec. 11. -- Amended 1960 Ky. Acts ch. 165, Part II, sec. 8.
- Created 1956 Ky. Acts ch. 110, sec. 19.
Notes of Decisions
Kentucky Retirement Systems v. Brown (2011)
ky · cites it 19×
“Brown Barbara Brown became a member of the Kentucky Retirement Systems in March 1992, and approximately eleven years later, in 2003, filed for retirement benefits pursuant to KRS 61.600. 2 In her petition at the administrative level, Brown claimed total disability due to her…”
Kentucky Retirement Systems v. Bowens (2009)
ky · cites it 10×
“3 In this regard, the Franklin Circuit Court found that, KRS 61.600 requires only a finding based on the examination of the objective medical evidence.”
Kentucky Retirement Systems v. West (2013)
ky · cites it 15×
“Burden of Proof West applied for disability benefits pursuant to KRS 61.600, which requires a showing that “[t]he incapacity does not result directly or indirectly from bodily injury, mental illness, disease, or condition which pre-existed membership in the system or…”
Kentucky Retirement Systems v. Wimberly (2016)
ky · cites it 10×
“Wimberly filed exceptions specifically arguing that res judicata did not apply to this claim and that adopting prior findings without any meaningful review defeated the purpose of KRS 61.600(2). Wimberly also argued there was no evidence -his diabetes pre-existed his employment…”
McManus v. Kentucky Retirement Systems (2004)
kyctapp · cites it 2×
“KRS 61.600 states in relevant part: (2) Upon the examination of the objective medical evidence by licensed physicians pursuant to KRS 61.”
Lindall v. Kentucky Retirement Systems (2003)
kyctapp · cites it 6×
“The pertinent statutory provisions are contained in KRS 61.600: (2) Upon the examination of the objective medical evidence by licensed physicians pursuant to KRS 61.”
Kentucky Retirement Systems v. Carson (2016)
ky · cites it 7×
“We note KERS’s argument that “[t]he statute embodies the core element of res judicata that a different outcome is only warranted' when new evidence is introduced sufficient to change the issue of whether permanent incapacity exists under KRS 61.600.” We' do not understand what…”
Kentucky Retirement Systems v. Lowe (2011)
kyctapp · cites it 4×
“The hearing officer found that Lowe met the applicable service requirements for disability retirement under KRS 61.600 and that her position with the Louisville Water Company fell within the definition of sedentary to light work pursuant to KRS 61.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 61.600(1) — 4 cases
McManus v. Kentucky Retirement Systems (2004)
kyctapp
“KRS 61.600 states in relevant part: (2) Upon the examination of the objective medical evidence by licensed physicians pursuant to KRS 61.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 61.600(1)(b) — 2 cases
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 61.600(1)(c) — 1 case
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 61.600(2) — 3 cases
Kentucky Retirement Systems v. Wimberly (2016)
ky
“Wimberly filed exceptions specifically arguing that res judicata did not apply to this claim and that adopting prior findings without any meaningful review defeated the purpose of KRS 61.600(2). Wimberly also argued there was no evidence -his diabetes pre-existed his employment…”
Kentucky Retirement Systems v. Carson (2016)
ky
“We note KERS’s argument that “[t]he statute embodies the core element of res judicata that a different outcome is only warranted' when new evidence is introduced sufficient to change the issue of whether permanent incapacity exists under KRS 61.600.” We' do not understand what…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 61.600(2)(b) — 2 cases
Lindall v. Kentucky Retirement Systems (2003)
kyctapp
“The pertinent statutory provisions are contained in KRS 61.600: (2) Upon the examination of the objective medical evidence by licensed physicians pursuant to KRS 61.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 61.600(3) — 14 cases
Kentucky Retirement Systems v. Brown (2011)
ky
“Brown Barbara Brown became a member of the Kentucky Retirement Systems in March 1992, and approximately eleven years later, in 2003, filed for retirement benefits pursuant to KRS 61.600. 2 In her petition at the administrative level, Brown claimed total disability due to her…”
Kentucky Retirement Systems v. West (2013)
ky
“Burden of Proof West applied for disability benefits pursuant to KRS 61.600, which requires a showing that “[t]he incapacity does not result directly or indirectly from bodily injury, mental illness, disease, or condition which pre-existed membership in the system or…”
Kentucky Retirement Systems v. Wimberly (2016)
ky
“Wimberly filed exceptions specifically arguing that res judicata did not apply to this claim and that adopting prior findings without any meaningful review defeated the purpose of KRS 61.600(2). Wimberly also argued there was no evidence -his diabetes pre-existed his employment…”
Kentucky Retirement Systems v. Lowe (2011)
kyctapp
“The hearing officer found that Lowe met the applicable service requirements for disability retirement under KRS 61.600 and that her position with the Louisville Water Company fell within the definition of sedentary to light work pursuant to KRS 61.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 61.600(3)(a) — 5 cases
Kentucky Retirement Systems v. Wimberly (2016)
ky
“Wimberly filed exceptions specifically arguing that res judicata did not apply to this claim and that adopting prior findings without any meaningful review defeated the purpose of KRS 61.600(2). Wimberly also argued there was no evidence -his diabetes pre-existed his employment…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 61.600(3)(b) — 3 cases
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 61.600(3)(d) — 10 cases
Kentucky Retirement Systems v. Brown (2011)
ky
“Brown Barbara Brown became a member of the Kentucky Retirement Systems in March 1992, and approximately eleven years later, in 2003, filed for retirement benefits pursuant to KRS 61.600. 2 In her petition at the administrative level, Brown claimed total disability due to her…”
Kentucky Retirement Systems v. West (2013)
ky
“Burden of Proof West applied for disability benefits pursuant to KRS 61.600, which requires a showing that “[t]he incapacity does not result directly or indirectly from bodily injury, mental illness, disease, or condition which pre-existed membership in the system or…”
Kentucky Retirement Systems v. Wimberly (2016)
ky
“Wimberly filed exceptions specifically arguing that res judicata did not apply to this claim and that adopting prior findings without any meaningful review defeated the purpose of KRS 61.600(2). Wimberly also argued there was no evidence -his diabetes pre-existed his employment…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 61.600(4)(a) — 2 cases
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 61.600(4)(b) — 2 cases
Kentucky Retirement Systems v. West (2013)
ky
“Burden of Proof West applied for disability benefits pursuant to KRS 61.600, which requires a showing that “[t]he incapacity does not result directly or indirectly from bodily injury, mental illness, disease, or condition which pre-existed membership in the system or…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 61.600(5) — 1 case
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 61.600(5)(a) — 5 cases
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 61.600(5)(a)(1) — 1 case
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 61.600(5)(a)(2) — 2 cases
Kentucky Retirement Systems v. Bowens (2009)
ky
“3 In this regard, the Franklin Circuit Court found that, KRS 61.600 requires only a finding based on the examination of the objective medical evidence.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 61.600(5)(b) — 4 cases
Kentucky Retirement Systems v. Bowens (2009)
ky
“3 In this regard, the Franklin Circuit Court found that, KRS 61.600 requires only a finding based on the examination of the objective medical evidence.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 61.600(5)(c) — 5 cases
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 61.600(8)(a) — 1 case
Lindall v. Kentucky Retirement Systems (2003)
kyctapp
“The pertinent statutory provisions are contained in KRS 61.600: (2) Upon the examination of the objective medical evidence by licensed physicians pursuant to KRS 61.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 61.600(S)(d) — 1 case
Kentucky Retirement Systems v. Brown (2011)
ky
“Brown Barbara Brown became a member of the Kentucky Retirement Systems in March 1992, and approximately eleven years later, in 2003, filed for retirement benefits pursuant to KRS 61.600. 2 In her petition at the administrative level, Brown claimed total disability due to her…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 61.600(l)(a) — 1 case
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 61.600(l)(b) — 2 cases
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 61.600(l)(c) — 1 case
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 61.600(l)(e) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.