Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 630
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 630.060 (2026)

Information confidential

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) Information supplied by the child to a court designated worker during any process prior to the filing of the petition shall be deemed confidential and shall not be subject to subpoena or to disclosure without the written consent of the child. (2) No complaint shall be received by the court designated worker alleging habitual truancy unless an adequate assessment of the child has been performed pursuant to KRS 159.140(1)(c), (d), and (f), unless it can be shown that the assessment could not be performed due to the child's failure to participate. Effective: March 31, 2003 History: Amended 2003 Ky. Acts ch. 159, sec. 2, effective March 31, 2003. -- Amended 1988 Ky. Acts ch. 350, sec. 84, effective April 10, 1988. -- Created 1986 Ky. Acts ch. 423, sec. 114, effective July 1, 1987.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 2003–2016 · leading case: T.D. v. Commonwealth, 165 S.W.3d 480 (Ky. Ct. App. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
T.D. v. Commonwealth, 165 S.W.3d 480 (Ky. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 4× “140 are stated in broad language, the legislature’s later enactment of KRS 630.060 shows its intent to require the Director to perform those goals in a particular case before bringing a child before the court as a habitual truant.”
N.K. v. Commonwealth, 324 S.W.3d 438 (Ky. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 5× “Because the truancy complaint did not comply with KRS 630.060(2) and KRS 159.140, we vacate the orders.”
B.H. v. Commonwealth, 329 S.W.3d 360 (Ky. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 6× “, KRS 630.060, and stating that “because the language of the statute requires compliance before a complaint may be received, the legislature intended to make these requirements a matter of subject matter jurisdiction.”
Commonwealth v. Deweese, 141 S.W.3d 372 (Ky. Ct. App. 2003). “110 (HIV testing); KRS 630.060 (information supplied to the court designated worker); KRS 164.”
S.B. v. Commonwealth, 396 S.W.3d 928 (Ky. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “” KRS 630.060(2). KRS 159.140(1) states in relevant part that: The director of pupil personnel, or an assistant appointed under KRS 159.”
J.L.C. v. Commonwealth, 491 S.W.3d 519 (Ky. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 9× “the legislature’s later enactment of KRS 630.060 shows its intent to require the Director to perform those góhls in a particular case'before bringing a child before the court as a habitual truant.”
NK v. Com., 324 S.W.3d 438 (Ky. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 5× “Because the truancy complaint did not comply with KRS 630.060(2) and KRS 159.140, we vacate the orders.”
TD v. Com., 165 S.W.3d 480 (Ky. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 4× “140 are stated in broad language, the legislature's later enactment of KRS 630.060 shows its intent to require the Director to perform those goals in a particular case before bringing a child before the court as a habitual truant.”
BH v. Com., 329 S.W.3d 360 (Ky. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 6× “, KRS 630.060, and stating that "because the language of the statute requires compliance before a complaint may be received, the legislature intended to make these requirements a matter of subject matter jurisdiction.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 630.060(2) — 8 cases
N.K. v. Commonwealth, 324 S.W.3d 438 (Ky. Ct. App. 2010). “Because the truancy complaint did not comply with KRS 630.060(2) and KRS 159.140, we vacate the orders.”
T.D. v. Commonwealth, 165 S.W.3d 480 (Ky. Ct. App. 2005). “140 are stated in broad language, the legislature’s later enactment of KRS 630.060 shows its intent to require the Director to perform those goals in a particular case before bringing a child before the court as a habitual truant.”
B.H. v. Commonwealth, 329 S.W.3d 360 (Ky. Ct. App. 2010). “, KRS 630.060, and stating that “because the language of the statute requires compliance before a complaint may be received, the legislature intended to make these requirements a matter of subject matter jurisdiction.”
S.B. v. Commonwealth, 396 S.W.3d 928 (Ky. Ct. App. 2013). “” KRS 630.060(2). KRS 159.140(1) states in relevant part that: The director of pupil personnel, or an assistant appointed under KRS 159.”
NK v. Com., 324 S.W.3d 438 (Ky. Ct. App. 2010). “Because the truancy complaint did not comply with KRS 630.060(2) and KRS 159.140, we vacate the orders.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.