Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 81

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 81.210

Repealed, 1980

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Annexation or reduction of territory by fourth-class city. History: Repealed 1980 Ky. Acts ch. 303, sec. 15, effective July 15, 1980. -- Amended 1976 (1st Extra. Sess.) Ky. Acts ch. 14, sec. 73. -- Amended 1966 Ky. Acts ch. 239, sec. 40. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 3483.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1948–1986 · leading case: Wakefield v. City of Shelbyville
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wakefield v. City of Shelbyville (1978) kyctapp · cites it 12× “KRS 81.210. On this appeal, the appellants make the following contentions: (1) that the city failed to give the required statutory notice of the commencement of the annexation litigation; (2) that the annexation proceeding must be dismissed because of the defective notice; (3)…”
City of Olive Hill v. Howard (1954) kyctapp · cites it 6× “The complaint was dismissed on the ground that the ordinance had not been advertised in the local newspaper for a period of three weeks within the meaning and requirement of KRS 81.210. The City of Olive Hill, by its governing body, enacted an ordinance on January 18, 1954,…”
City of St. Matthews v. Beha (1977) kyctapp · cites it 5× “The statutes which govern the publication of notice in annexation procedures in fourth-class cities are KRS 81.210 and 81.220, which provide as follows: “81.”
Louisville Shopping Center, Inc. v. City of St. Matthews (1982) ky “Matthews commenced the present litigation in 1977, the annexation procedure was set out in KRS 81.210 and 81.220. 1 Pursuant to those statutes the city enacted an ordinance proposing the annexation.”
Rose v. City of Paris (1980) kyctapp · cites it 2× “The principal issue presented by this appeal is whether an annexation proceeding instituted by a fourth class city pursuant to KRS 81.210 and 81.220 may be completed under the standards set forth in those statutes when, during the pendency of the annexation, the city is elevated…”
Buchanan v. City of Dayton (1962) kyctapphigh “In this case, however, KRS 81.210 compels the filing of suit by the city, and it is not possible in any way to complete an annexation independently of the circuit court.”
Thomas v. Spragens (1948) kyctapphigh “The city of Lebanon by proper proceedings under KRS 81.210 et seq. (which does not relate to school purposes) annexed certain adjacent territory.”
O'Hara v. City of South Fort Mitchell (1956) kyctapp “The issues presented involve the construction of KRS 81.210. The pertinent parts of that statute are as follows: “ * * * The ordinance shall be published for not less than three weeks in a newspaper published in the city or county * * *.”
Smeltzer v. Messer (1949) kyctapphigh “KRS 81.210. In the face of this limitation, we are confronted with a situation where a city has attempted to control the use and' development of land located in a territory which it is not authorized to annex.”
City of Hickman, Inc. v. Choate (1964) kyctapp “The City of Hickman appeals from a judgment denying its petition under KRS 81.210 to annex an area adjoining its east and southeast city limits.”
City of Okolona v. Lindsey (1986) ky “050, and Wakefield involved annexation of territory by a fourth-class city, KRS 81.210 and KRS 81.220 (now repealed), the principle is the same.”
City of St. Matthews v. Morrow (1966) kyctapp “Appellant filed its petition in the circuit court as authorized by KRS 81.210 for judgment annexing that territory.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.