Auto. Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Williams, 17 So. 2d 506 (La. Ct. App. 1944). · Go Syfert
Search
Auto. Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Williams, 17 So. 2d 506 (La. Ct. App. 1944). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Gebbia v. City of New Orleans (la, 1966-06-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1944 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1944 1985 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Gebbia v. City of New Orleans
La. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kientz v. Charles Dennery, Inc. (La.App.), 17 So.2d 506 ; Delpido v. Colony (La.App.), 52 So.2d 720 ; Story v. Story, Administrator (La.App.), 131 So.2d 913 ; McMurray v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. (La.App.), 141 So.2d 898 .
discussed Cited "see" Seiner v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co.
La. Ct. App. · 1944 · signal: see · confidence high
See Thomas v. Roberts, 144 So. 70 and Mrs. Virginia Culotta Kientz v. Charles Dennery, Inc., La.App., 17 So.2d 506 , but that principle has application only where it appears that the conditions were such that a person exercising only slight care would have noticed the other vehicle, and that where it appears also that had the other vehicle been noticed it would have been apparent to the operator of the favored vehicle that the operator of the other car either could not or would not stop.
The Automobile Insurance Co. of Hartford, Connecticut
v.
Mrs. W. Horace Williams
No. 17883..
Louisiana Court of Appeal.
Apr 3, 1944.
17 So. 2d 506
Frank H. Langridge and Waverly A. Henning, both of Gretna for plaintiffs-appellees. Edward Rightor and H. Sellers, both of New Orleans, for defendants-appellants.
McCALEB, Judge..
Published

This case was consolidated for trial with the matter entitled Boudra v. Williams et al., No. 17,884, 17 So.2d 502, and it was agreed between counsel of record that the decision rendered in the Boudra case would be determinative of the issue presented herein.

Therefore, for the reasons assigned in our opinion handed down this day in case No. 17,884 of the docket, the judgment appealed from is reversed, and it is now ordered that plaintiff's suit be dismissed at its cost.

Reversed.