Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 782 So. 2d 573 (La. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 782 So. 2d 573 (La. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
100 citation events (100 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Gruver v. Allstate Insurance (ca5, 2024-11-04)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" Gruver v. Allstate Insurance
5th Cir. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 2000-0947 (La. 12/19/00), 774 So. 2d 119 , 135 & n.17, opinion corrected on reh’g, 2000-0947 (La. 3/16/01), 782 So. 2d 573 ; Power v. State Farm Fire & Cas.
discussed Cited "see" Law Industries, LLC v. State of Louisiana, Department of Education, Recovery School District and Advanced Environmental Consulting, Inc.
La. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 00- 0947 (La. 3/16/01), 782 So. 2d 573, 574 (per curiam, on rehearing) (“[W]here certiorari is granted on the application of one party to a suit, the judgment (decree) cannot be amended or changed to the benefit of other parties who have failed to apply for such review.”); Logan v. Louisiana Dock Co., 541 So.2d 182, 192 (La. 1989) (per curiam, on rehearing) (“[A] respondent may defend a judgment on any ground consistent with the record, even if rejected in the lower court, but he cannot attack the decree with a view either to enlarging his own rights or to l…
discussed Cited "see" GeoVera Specialty Ins Co. v. Ebert Joachin
5th Cir. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 774 So. 2d 119 , 124–25 (La. 2000) (noting that when “a literal reading of” a contract’s term leads to absurd results, the court must “attempt to determine the [term’s] true meaning and interpretation”), reh’g granted on other grounds, 782 So. 2d 573 (La. 2001); cf. LA.
cited Cited "see" Forrest v. Ville St. John Owners Ass'n, Inc.
unknown court · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp. , 00-0947 (La. 3/16/01), 782 So.2d 573 .
cited Cited "see" Hayes v. De Barton
La. Ct. App. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
Co., 276 So.2d 309 (La.1973); see Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 00-0947 (La. 12/19/00), 774 So.2d 119, 128-29 , opinion corrected on reh’g, 00-0947 (La. 3/16/01), 782 So.2d 573 . .
cited Cited "see" Power v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
La. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 00-947 (La.12/19/00), 774 So.2d 119 , 135 n. 17, opinion corrected on reh’g, 00-947 (La.3/16/01), 782 So.2d 573 .
discussed Cited "see" Danny Kelly v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
La. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 00-0947, p. 14 (La.12/19/00), 774 So.2d 119, 129 , reh'g granted on other grounds, 00-0947 (La.3/16/01), 782 So.2d 573 ("[I]t is only when courts consistently recognize a longstanding rule of law outside of legislative expression that the rule of law will become part of Louisiana’s custom under Civil Code article 3 and be enforced as the law of the state."); compare La.
discussed Cited "see" Martco Ltd Prtnshp v. Wellons Inc
5th Cir. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 774 So. 2d 119, 124 (La. 2000), modified on other grounds, 782 So. 2d 573 (La. 2001).11 That is, Wellons must demonstrate that the damages for which indemnity is sought constitute “property damage” caused by an “occurrence,” as those terms are defined in the Policy.
discussed Cited "see" Martco Ltd. Partnership v. Wellons, Inc. (2×)
5th Cir. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 774 So.2d 119, 124 (La.2000), modified on other grounds, 782 So.2d 573 (La.2001).
discussed Cited "see" Beck v. BURGUENO
La. Ct. App. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., XXXX-XXXX (La.12/19/00), 774 So.2d 119 , modified on other grounds on reh'g, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/16/01), 782 So.2d 573 ; Alexander v. *409 Cornett, 42,147 (La.App. 2 Cir. 7/11/07), 961 So.2d 622 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/2/07), 966 So.2d 603 ; Jones v. Foster, supra .
discussed Cited "see" Allstate Insurance v. Barron (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Conn. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 774 So. 2d 119, 126-27 , modified on other grounds, 782 So. 2d 573 (La. 2002); see also id., 140 n.6 (Victory, J., dissenting).
cited Cited "see" Miller v. Superior Shipyard and Fabrication
La. Ct. App. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., XXXX-XXXX, p. 5 (La.12/19/00), 774 So.2d 119, 124 , modified on other grounds on reh'g, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/16/01), 782 So.2d 573 .
cited Cited "see" Miller v. SUPERIOR SHIPYARD AND FABRICATION
La. Ct. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., XXXX-XXXX, p. 5 (La.12/19/00), 774 So.2d 119, 124 , modified on other grounds on reh'g, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/16/01), 782 So.2d 573 .
discussed Cited "see" Gaylord Container Corporation v. CNA Ins. Companies
La. Ct. App. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Doerr v. Mobile Oil Corporation, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/16/01), 782 So.2d 573 (on rehearing) ( per curiam ). [7] As used in Advisory Letter 97-01, the phrase "standard pollution exclusion" encompasses both the original absolute pollution exclusion as well as its subsequent revisions and its progeny, including the total pollution exclusion.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Richardson v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance (2×)
D.C. · 2003 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 774 So.2d 119, 132-34 (La.2000) (chronicling inaccurate statements by representatives of the insurance industry regarding the meaning of earlier pollution exclusion clauses), opinion corrected on unrelated grounds, 782 So.2d 573 (La. 2001) (per curiam); Morton Int'l, Inc. v. Gen.
Phyllis Kay Roby DOERR, et al.
v.
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, et al.
2000-CC-0947.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Mar 16, 2001.
782 So. 2d 573
Per Curiam.
Cited by 80 opinions  |  Published

For majority opinion of the court, see 774 So.2d 119.

ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Rehearing granted for the sole purposes of correcting a misstatement of fact and clarifying the decree which are the only issues raised by the rehearing applicant, Genesis Insurance Company.

First, on the consent of all the parties, the sentence at the top of page 3: "This exclusion was not part of the original policy, but was adopted and placed in the policy on February 27, 1996." is changed to read as follows: "This exclusion was part[*574] of the original policy, but was not countersigned by the parties until February 27, 1996." This change does not affect the reasoning or holding of the original opinion.

Second, in this case, only St. Bernard Parish sought review by this court of the judgement of the court of appeal that dismissed the principal demand against Genesis by the plaintiffs and the cross-claim by the Parish. "[W]here certiorari is granted on the application of one party to a suit, the judgment (decree) cannot be amended or changed to the benefit of other parties who have failed to apply for such review." Jordan v. Travelers Ins. Co., 257 La. 995, 1001, 245 So.2d 151, 153 (1971) (collecting authorities). Thus, the decree is revised to read as follows: "For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the court of appeal dismissing St. Bernard Parish's cross claim against Genesis Insurance Company is reversed, and the district court's ruling denying Genesis's Motion for Summary Judgment against the Parish is reinstated. The case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion."