La. R.S. » RS

La. Rev. Stat. § 10:1-101

TITLE 10 COMMERCIAL LAWS

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section LA-LEGlegis.la.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

TITLE 10 COMMERCIAL LAWS

CHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

PART 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

§1-101. Short titles

(a) This Title may be cited as the Uniform Commercial Code.

(b) This Chapter may be cited as Uniform Commercial Code -- General Provisions.

Added by Acts 1974, No. 92, §1, eff. Jan. 1, 1975; Acts 2006, No. 533, §1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 30 cases, 1978–2017 · leading case: ASP Enterprises, Inc. v. Guillory
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
ASP Enterprises, Inc. v. Guillory (2009) lactapp “R.S. 10:1-101, et seq. (the UCC motion).”
Brill v. Catfish Shaks of America, Inc. (1989) laed · cites it 2× “See La.Rev.Stat.Ann. § 10:1-101 (West 1983). 11 .”
Aaron & Turner, L.L.C. v. Perret (2009) lactapp “), the Uniform Commercial Code (LSA-R.S. 10:1-101 et seq.), etc.), or a shorthand method of conveying the Civil Code concept of a bilateral contract in which something of value is conveyed by each party.”
Ducote v. Whitney National Bank (2017) lactapp “R.S. 10:1-101 et seq. La. R.S. 10:1-103 states: (a) This Title shall be liberally construed and applied to promote its underlying purposes and policies, which are: (1) to simplify, clarify, and modernize the law governing commercial transactions; (2) to permit the continued…”
Block v. Bernard, Cassisa, Elliott & Davis (2005) lactapp “R.S. 10:1-101, et seq., comparable to those of the other payees regarding the possession, indorsement, and negotiation of the check as a negotiable instrument.”
Murungi v. Mercedes Benz Credit Corp. (2001) nywd “(Louisiana Lemon Law); La. Rev. Stat. §§ 10:1-101 to 10:9-509 (Louisiana’s adoption of the Uniform Commercial Code); La.”
Schweibish v. Pontchartrain State Bank (1980) lactapp “[4] See Comment to R.S. 10:1-101. [5] R.S. 10:5-103(1)(a).”
Cromwell v. Commerce & Energy Bank (1984) lactapp “The Commercial laws (LSA-R.S. 10:1-101 et seq.) are modeled after the Uniform Commercial Code which has been adopted in every other state of this country.”
Succession of Amos (1982) lactapp “rther proceedings in order that the parties hereto may have the opportunity to introduce any additional evidence bearing upon the negotiability or non-negotiability of the certificate of deposit in question and whether, if negotiable, the circumstances surrounding its alleged…”
Daube v. Bruno (1986) la “R.S. 10:1-101 et seq., we must keep in mind the relevant purposes, rules of construction, and principles specifically provided by the legislature for Louisiana's Commercial Laws.”
Succession of Serio (1992) lactapp “10:3-201(4), eliminated the need for an authentic act for donations of negotiable instruments, making donations inter vivos subject to the Commercial Laws of Louisiana, R.S. 10:1-101 et. seq. 10:3-201(3) says a transfer of the instrument vests in the transferee such rights as…”
Simmons, Morris & Carroll, LLC v. Capital One, N.A. (2014) lactapp “R.S. 10:1-101, et seq., and the indemnification provision under the wire transfer agreement.”
Show all 30 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.