La. R.S. » RS

La. Rev. Stat. § 10:1-201

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section LA-LEGlegis.la.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PART 2. GENERAL DEFINITIONS AND PRINCIPLES OF INTERPRETATION

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 74 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1978–2025 · leading case: Philadelphia Gear Corporation v. Central Bank
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Philadelphia Gear Corporation v. Central Bank (1983) ca5 · cites it 4× “R.S. 10:1-201(2). This representation signals to the issuer that the beneficiary has relinquished title.”
Asian Intern. v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, ETC. (1983) lactapp · cites it 5× “R.S. 10:1-201. Negotiation is the process by which the transferee of an instrument becomes a holder.”
Automotive Leasing Specialists, L.L.C. v. Little (2008) lawd · cites it 39× “La.Rev.Stat. § 10:1-201(35) (West 2008) (emphasis added).”
U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Dumas (2014) lactapp · cites it 5× “R.S. 10:1-201, UCC Comment 37 (emphasis added).”
Brill v. Catfish Shaks of America, Inc. (1989) laed · cites it 5× “In 1984, the Commercial Laws defined good faith as “honesty in fact in the conduct or transaction concerned,” see La. Rev.Stat.Ann. § 10:1-201 (West 1983).”
Hewitt v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana (2001) lactapp · cites it 3× “R.S. 10:1-201(37). La.R.S. 9:3306(12)(b).”
Neighbors Federal Credit Union v. Anderson (2016) lactapp “R.S. 10:1-201(20) as “honesty in fact and the observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing.”
Confederate Welding & Safety Supply, Inc. v. Bank of the Mid-South (1984) lactapp · cites it 2× “LSA-R.S. 10:1-201. The Third Circuit has indicated in dictum that the definition contained in LSA-R.”
Brooks v. Transamerica Financial Advisors (2011) lactapp · cites it 2× “R.S. 10:1-201, indicate that the definitions provided are for use in their respective provisions.”
American Bank v. Saxena (1989) la “R.S. 10:1-201. A negotiable instrument must (a) be signed by the maker or drawer; and (b) contain an unconditional promise to pay a sum certain in money; and (c) be payable on demand or at a definite time; and (d) be payable to order or to bearer.”
Ouachita Nat. v. Gulf States Land & Dev. (1991) lactapp “R.S. 10:1-201. Once the holder proves the maker's signature, or the maker admits it, the holder has made out his case by mere production of the instrument and is entitled to recover in the absence of any further evidence.”
Med Data Service Bureau v. Bank of La. (2004) lactapp · cites it 2× “R.S. 10:1-201(28). Whether Med Data failed to exercise ordinary care and whether this negligence substantially contributed to the making of a forged signature on a check are findings of fact.”
Show all 74 citing cases →
— La. Rev. Stat. § 10:1-201(14) — 1 case
Interdiction of Vicknair (2002) lactapp
— La. Rev. Stat. § 10:1-201(19) — 3 cases
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Melancon (1996) lactapp
Cable Cast Magazine v. Premier Bank (1999) lactapp
Cluster 7059
— La. Rev. Stat. § 10:1-201(2) — 1 case
Philadelphia Gear Corporation v. Central Bank (1983) ca5 “R.S. 10:1-201(2). This representation signals to the issuer that the beneficiary has relinquished title.”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 10:1-201(20) — 5 cases
Neighbors Federal Credit Union v. Anderson (2016) lactapp “R.S. 10:1-201(20) as “honesty in fact and the observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing.”
Block v. Bernard, Cassisa, Elliott & Davis (2005) lactapp
U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Dumas (2014) lactapp “R.S. 10:1-201, UCC Comment 37 (emphasis added).”
Hollis v. Norton (1991) lactapp
Credit Recoveries, Inc. v. Crow (2003) lactapp
— La. Rev. Stat. § 10:1-201(21) — 1 case
ASP Enterprises, Inc. v. Guillory (2009) lactapp
— La. Rev. Stat. § 10:1-201(21)(A) — 3 cases
In re Jarrell (2018) lactapp
Sonnier v. Gordon (2016) lactapp
Budget Construction Services L L C v. Victory Exteriors Roofing & Sheet Metal L L C (2022) lawd
— La. Rev. Stat. § 10:1-201(25) — 4 cases
Swift Energy Operating, L.L.C. v. Plemco-South, Inc. (2015) lactapp
Kugle v. Hennessy (1997) lactapp
Advocate Financial v. Longenecker & Assoc. (2008) lactapp
Advocate Financial, L.L.C. v. Longenecker & Associates, Ltd. (2008) lactapp
— La. Rev. Stat. § 10:1-201(25)(c) — 1 case
Cable Cast Magazine v. Premier Bank (1999) lactapp
— La. Rev. Stat. § 10:1-201(26) — 1 case
Grocery Supply Co. v. Winterton Food Stores, Inc. (1995) lactapp
— La. Rev. Stat. § 10:1-201(28) — 1 case
Med Data Service Bureau v. Bank of La. (2004) lactapp “R.S. 10:1-201(28). Whether Med Data failed to exercise ordinary care and whether this negligence substantially contributed to the making of a forged signature on a check are findings of fact.”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 10:1-201(30) — 1 case
Med Data Service Bureau v. Bank of La. (2004) lactapp “R.S. 10:1-201(28). Whether Med Data failed to exercise ordinary care and whether this negligence substantially contributed to the making of a forged signature on a check are findings of fact.”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 10:1-201(32) — 2 cases
Moncrief v. Succession of Armstrong (2006) lactapp
Gmac v. Crain Chevrolet-Olds-Pontiac (1992) lactapp
— La. Rev. Stat. § 10:1-201(35) — 1 case
Automotive Leasing Specialists, L.L.C. v. Little (2008) lawd “La.Rev.Stat. § 10:1-201(35) (West 2008) (emphasis added).”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 10:1-201(37) — 10 cases
Automotive Leasing Specialists, L.L.C. v. Little (2008) lawd “La.Rev.Stat. § 10:1-201(35) (West 2008) (emphasis added).”
Hewitt v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana (2001) lactapp “R.S. 10:1-201(37). La.R.S. 9:3306(12)(b).”
U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Dumas (2014) lactapp “R.S. 10:1-201, UCC Comment 37 (emphasis added).”
First Nat. Bank v. Beckwith MacHinery Co. (1995) la
In Re: Argo Fincl (2003) ca5
— La. Rev. Stat. § 10:1-201(4) — 1 case
Brooks v. Transamerica Financial Advisors (2011) lactapp “R.S. 10:1-201, indicate that the definitions provided are for use in their respective provisions.”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 10:1-201(40) — 1 case
Wooley v. LUCKSINGER (2009) lactapp
— La. Rev. Stat. § 10:1-201(41) — 2 cases
American Turbine Technology, Inc. v. Omni Bancshares, Inc. (2017) lactapp
Budget Construction Services L L C v. Victory Exteriors Roofing & Sheet Metal L L C (2022) lawd
— La. Rev. Stat. § 10:1-201(44) — 1 case
Cross Keys Bank v. Ward (2021) lawb
— La. Rev. Stat. § 10:1-201(45) — 1 case
Dupre v. Joe's Riverside Seafood, Inc. (1991) lactapp
— La. Rev. Stat. § 10:1-201(87) — 1 case
Automotive Leasing Specialists, L.L.C. v. Little (2008) lawd “La.Rev.Stat. § 10:1-201(35) (West 2008) (emphasis added).”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 10:1-201(9) — 2 cases
Philadelphia Gear Corporation v. Central Bank (1983) ca5 “R.S. 10:1-201(2). This representation signals to the issuer that the beneficiary has relinquished title.”
Farmers-Merchants Bank & Trust Co. v. Southern Structures, LLC (2014) lactapp
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.