La. R.S. » RS

La. Rev. Stat. § 9:399

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section LA-LEGlegis.la.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PART I-B. ESTABLISHMENT OF SUPPORT

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases, 1987–2015 · leading case: State of Louisiana, Department of Children and Family Services, in the Interest of A.L. v. Thomas Robert Lowrie
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State of Louisiana, Department of Children and Family Services, in the Interest of A.L. v. Thomas Robert Lowrie (2015) la · cites it 2× “)); LSA-R.S. 9:399(A) (“In a proceeding for the determination of paternity and upon motion of any party, the court presiding over the paternity issue shall issue an order of interim child support if there is clear and convincing evidence of paternity on the basis of genetic…”
McKenzie v. Thomas (1996) lactapp · cites it 6× “R.S. 9:399 are unconstitutional, violating the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.”
Cantillo v. Cantillo (1987) lactapp · cites it 2× “Cantillo has appealed, contending: (1) The judgment should have specified that she was granted a divorce and given permanent care, custody and control of this couple's minor child; (2) The judgment should have ordered child support payments to start the date the petition for…”
State Through DHHR v. Simmons (1988) lactapp “LRS 9:399. DECREE We reverse the modified judgment and the child support order in the original judgment.”
STATE, DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERV. v. McCorkle (1997) lactapp · cites it 2× “R.S. 9:399 AND C.C. ART. 240 In this assignment of error, the defendant alleges that the "unilateral right of the mother to choose whether to bear a child" in conjunction with the paternity statutes, violates his constitutional right to privacy.”
State v. Smith (1992) lactapp “Under the provisions of LSA-R.S. 9:399, a judgment for child support rendered against a defendant, who has been adjudged in a suit to establish paternity to be the parent of the child for whom support is ordered, shall be effective from the date on which the paternity suit was…”
Patterson v. Johnson (1987) lactapp “Plaintiff may seek child support following the judgment of paternity under LSA-R.S. 9:399. We therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court decreeing Ronald Lee Johnson to be the father of Eric Dewayne Patterson.”
Rigaud v. Deruise (1993) lactapp “This matter is remanded to the Civil District Court for a determination of child support in accordance with LSA-R.S. 9:399. REVERSED AND RENDERED IN PART; REMANDED IN PART.”
Watson v. Hampton (1990) lactapp “R.S. 9:399 deals specifically with paternity actions.”
State v. Holleman (1998) lactapp “LSA-R.S. 9:399 specifically provides that “.”
Hoffmann v. Lucia (1992) lactapp “R.S. 9:399 provides that child support rendered in connection with a suit to establish paternity should be retroactive to the date of filing unless the judge finds good cause not to do so.”
Williams v. Williams (1988) lactapp “R.S. 9:399 establishes a general rule that support orders rendered upon a determination of paternity *1070 "shall be effective from the date on which the paternity suit was filed.”
Show all 14 citing cases →
— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:399(A) — 1 case
State of Louisiana, Department of Children and Family Services, in the Interest of A.L. v. Thomas Robert Lowrie (2015) la “)); LSA-R.S. 9:399(A) (“In a proceeding for the determination of paternity and upon motion of any party, the court presiding over the paternity issue shall issue an order of interim child support if there is clear and convincing evidence of paternity on the basis of genetic…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.