La. R.S. » RS

La. Rev. Stat. § 9:341

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section LA-LEGlegis.la.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

SUBPART C. PROTECTIVE AND REMEDIAL PROVISIONS

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23 cases (10 in the last 5 years), 1993–2026 · leading case: Harper v. Harper
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Harper v. Harper (2000) lactapp · cites it 3× “R.S. 9:341 does not apply to the facts of this case.”
Evans v. Terrell (1995) lactapp · cites it 2× “LSA-R.S. 9:341. In this case, the trial court ruled that Terrell was entitled to visitation with the child under the supervision of the maternal grandparents.”
State in Interest of AC (1994) la “" [6] This would have a definite impact on other areas of limitations on parental rights, such as proceedings involving LSA-R.S. 9:341 (formerly LSA-C.C. art. 133, amended and reenacted by Act 261 of 1993, effective January 1, 1994), which provides that Whenever the court finds…”
State, Department of Social Services, Office of Community Services ex rel. A.D. (1993) lactapp · cites it 3× “Amendments to the law by the Legislature in 1993 transferred Article 133 from the Civil Code to Title 9 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes where it appears as LSA-R.S. 9:341. Acts 1993, No. 261, §§ 5 and 9.”
Hollingsworth v. Semerad (2001) lactapp · cites it 2× “R.S. 9:341 addresses visitation restrictions in child custody matters.”
E. R. v. T. S. (2018) lactapp · cites it 2× “…that the alleged sexual abuse of AS by Ms. R was not proven by a preponderance of the evidence, and thus neither La. R.S. 9:341 5 nor La. R.S. 9:364 6 was triggered. As an appellate court, we will not second-guess the district court's credibility determinations. Where…”
State ex rel. J.B. (2001) lactapp “R.S. 9:341, instead of the Post-Separation Family Violence Relief Act, La.”
Evans v. Lites (1998) lactapp “NOTES [1] Given our resolution of Evans' first assignment of error, we do not address his remaining assignments of error regarding whether the trial court erred in failing to apply LSA-R.S. 9:341, 9:364 and 9:367, which set forth conditions and restrictions applicable following…”
Shamell Mary Lavigne Versus Tyrell Matthew Braud (2021) lactapp · cites it 7× “R.S. 9:341 he would be allowed unsupervised visitation with A.”
Laurent v. Prevost (2018) · cites it 2× “R.S. 9:341 governs restrictions on visitation in child custody matters: A.”
David Joseph Main Versus Dena Bach Main (2020) lactapp · cites it 5× “136 provides that “Subject to R.S. 9:341 and 364, a parent not granted custody or joint custody of a child is entitled to reasonable visitation rights unless the court finds, after a hearing, that visitation would not be in the best interest of the child.”
Kyle Durand v. Kandy Rose (2022) lactapp · cites it 5× “] R.S. 9:341.” La. R.S. 9:364(E). La. R.S. 9:341 provides for supervised visitation between the abusive parent and the child or children pending the fulfillment of certain conditions.”
Show all 23 citing cases →
— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:341(A) — 6 cases
Harper v. Harper (2000) lactapp “R.S. 9:341 does not apply to the facts of this case.”
Paris Phillip Pierre Versus Reanda Fields Pierre (2024) lactapp
Kyle Durand v. Kandy Rose (2022) lactapp “] R.S. 9:341.” La. R.S. 9:364(E). La. R.S. 9:341 provides for supervised visitation between the abusive parent and the child or children pending the fulfillment of certain conditions.”
Narquis Barak v. Antoine Michele Saacks, III (2022) lactapp
Narquis Barak v. Antoine Michele Saacks, III (2022) lactapp
— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:341(B) — 1 case
David Joseph Main Versus Dena Bach Main (2020) lactapp “136 provides that “Subject to R.S. 9:341 and 364, a parent not granted custody or joint custody of a child is entitled to reasonable visitation rights unless the court finds, after a hearing, that visitation would not be in the best interest of the child.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.