Grant v. Boston & Maine R.R., 95 A. 699 (Me. 1915). · Go Syfert
Search
Grant v. Boston & Maine R.R., 95 A. 699 (Me. 1915). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Van Beek (iowa, 1989-07-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Van Beek
Iowa · 1989 · confidence medium
United States v. Amuny, 767 F.2d 1113, 1120 (5th Cir.1985) (officials may “in good faith immediately and unconditionally release the defendant and prefer no federal criminal charges against him.”); People v. Corsini, 161 Cal.App.3d 514, 517 , 207 Cal.Rptr. 686, 688 (1984); Therriault v. Breton, 114 Me. 137, 142 , 95 A. 699, 701 (1915); see generally Uniform R.Crim.P. 244, 10 U.L.A. 58 (1974).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Hawkins (2×)
Me. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See for example, Theriault v. Breton, 114 Me. 137 , 95 A. 699 (1915).
Silas M. Grant
v.
Boston & Maine Railroad George A. Tilton v. Boston & Maine Railroad Stephen J. Hatch v. Boston & Maine Railroad Freeman H. Penney v. Boston & Maine Railroad
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.
Aug 30, 1915.
95 A. 699
E. P. Spinney, for plaintiffs. G. C. Yeaton, and Emery & Waterhouse, for defendant.
Published

At the Portland term, 1915, of the Law Court, the following entry was made on the docket in each of the above named cases; “Transcript of evidence to be filed within 30 days, or motion for a new trial overruled for want of prosecution.”

It having been made to appear that no transcript was filed within said thirty days, the entry will be, in each case, motion overruled for want of prosecution.