Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 1
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 1, § 408 (2026)

Public records available for public inspection and copying

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1975, c. 758 (NEW). PL 2003, c. 709, §2 (RPR). PL 2007, c. 501, §1 (AMD). PL 2009, c. 240, §4 (AMD). PL 2011, c. 662, §4 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 34 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1988–2024 · leading case: Cook v. Lisbon Sch. Comm., 682 A.2d 672 (Me. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cook v. Lisbon Sch. Comm., 682 A.2d 672 (Me. 1996). · cites it 4× “On February 16, 1995, Cook submitted a written request to the School Committee for inspection of public records pursuant to 1 M.R.S.A. § 408 (1989) and requested a hearing on the nonrenewal of her employment contract before a “board of three arbitrators.”
Cyr v. Madawaska Sch. Dep't, 2007 ME 28, 916 A.2d 967. · cites it 4× “DISCUSSION [¶ 6] The Department contends that the redacted portions of the report fall under at least one of three exceptions to public disclosure: subsections 6101(2)(B)(3), (5), and (6). [¶ 7] The report is a public record as defined by the Maine Freedom of Access Act (FOAA).”
Town of Burlington v. Hosp. Admin. Dist. No. 1, 2001 ME 59, 769 A.2d 857. · cites it 2× “that is in the possession or custody of an agency or public official of this State or any of its political subdivisions, ... and has been received or prepared for use in connection with the transaction of public or governmental business .”
Blethen Maine Newspapers, Inc. v. State, 2005 ME 56, 871 A.2d 523. · cites it 2× “" 1 M.R.S.A. § 408(1) (Supp.2004). It also provides that "[r]ecords that have been designated confidential by statute" are an exception to the definition of "public records" and are not subject to disclosure.”
Dow v. Caribou Chamber of Com. & Indus., 2005 ME 113, 884 A.2d 667. · cites it 2× “§ 408, which states that “every person has the right to inspect and copy any public record during the regular business hours of the agency or official having custody of the public record within a reasonable period of time after making a request to inspect or copy the public…”
Maine Health Care Ass'n Workers' Comp. Fund v. Superintendent of Ins., 2009 ME 5, 962 A.2d 968. · cites it 3× “The confidential nature of this information does not limit or affect its use by the superintendent in administering this Act, including, but not limited to, communications with the service agent, the Workers’ Compensation Board or the Maine Self-Insurance Guarantee Association.”
MacImage of Maine, LLC v. Androscoggin Cnty., 2012 ME 44, 40 A.3d 975. “§ 651 (2011) (stating that, notwithstanding FOAA, “this chapter governs fees for copying records maintained under this chapter”)); see also 1 M.R.S. § 408(1) (2011) (stating that the FOAA provisions regarding the right to inspect and copy public records apply “[e]xcept as…”
South Portland Police Patrol Ass'n v. City of South Portland, 2006 ME 55, 896 A.2d 960. “” 1 M.R.S. § 408(1); see also 1 M.R.S. § 402(3) (defining public records).”
Bangor Publ'g Co. v. City of Bangor, 544 A.2d 733 (Me. 1988). · cites it 2× “, 3 1 M.R.S.A. § 408 (1979) (emphasis added).”
Med. Mut. Ins. v. Bureau of Ins., 2005 ME 12, 866 A.2d 117. “1 M.R.S.A. § 408(1) (Supp.2004). The party seeking the denial of a request to inspect and copy a record pursuant to section 408(1) has the burden to demonstrate the basis for the denial.”
Springfield Terminal Ry. Co. v. Dep't of Transp., 2000 ME 126, 754 A.2d 353. · cites it 2× “See 1 M.R.S.A. § 408 (1989). 1 Springfield argues that the trial court erred in deciding that those documents were not “public records” as defined by 1 M.”
Campbell v. Town of MacHias, 661 A.2d 1133 (Me. 1995). “1 M.R.S.A. § 408 (emphasis added). A provision of the Criminal History Record Information Act, 16 M.”
Show all 34 citing cases →
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 1, § 408(1): 14 cases
Cyr v. Madawaska Sch. Dep't, 2007 ME 28, 916 A.2d 967. “DISCUSSION [¶ 6] The Department contends that the redacted portions of the report fall under at least one of three exceptions to public disclosure: subsections 6101(2)(B)(3), (5), and (6). [¶ 7] The report is a public record as defined by the Maine Freedom of Access Act (FOAA).”
Blethen Maine Newspapers, Inc. v. State, 2005 ME 56, 871 A.2d 523. “" 1 M.R.S.A. § 408(1) (Supp.2004). It also provides that "[r]ecords that have been designated confidential by statute" are an exception to the definition of "public records" and are not subject to disclosure.”
Maine Health Care Ass'n Workers' Comp. Fund v. Superintendent of Ins., 2009 ME 5, 962 A.2d 968. “The confidential nature of this information does not limit or affect its use by the superintendent in administering this Act, including, but not limited to, communications with the service agent, the Workers’ Compensation Board or the Maine Self-Insurance Guarantee Association.”
MacImage of Maine, LLC v. Androscoggin Cnty., 2012 ME 44, 40 A.3d 975. “§ 651 (2011) (stating that, notwithstanding FOAA, “this chapter governs fees for copying records maintained under this chapter”)); see also 1 M.R.S. § 408(1) (2011) (stating that the FOAA provisions regarding the right to inspect and copy public records apply “[e]xcept as…”
Dow v. Caribou Chamber of Com. & Indus., 2005 ME 113, 884 A.2d 667. “§ 408, which states that “every person has the right to inspect and copy any public record during the regular business hours of the agency or official having custody of the public record within a reasonable period of time after making a request to inspect or copy the public…”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 1, § 408(3)(A): 1 case
MacImage of Maine v. Hancock Cnty., No. CUMcv-08-589 (Me. Super. Ct Sept. 1, 2009).
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 1, § 408(3)(B): 1 case
MacImage of Maine v. Hancock Cnty., No. CUMcv-08-589 (Me. Super. Ct Sept. 1, 2009).
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 1, § 408(3)(C): 1 case
MacImage of Maine v. Androscoggin Cnty., No. CUMcv-09-605 (Me. Super. Ct Dec. 23, 2009).
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 1, § 408(6): 1 case
Hawes v. Cumberland Cnty. Sheriff's Off., No. CUMap-19-39 (Me. Super. Ct Jan. 3, 2022).
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 1, § 408(7): 1 case
Hawes v. Cumberland Cnty. Sheriff's Off., No. CUMap-19-39 (Me. Super. Ct Jan. 3, 2022).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.