Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 11
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 11, § 9-204 (2026)

After-acquired property; future advances

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1965, c. 306, §23 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 526, §§28-32 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 696, §128 (RPR). PL 1999, c. 699, §A1 (RP). PL 1999, c. 699, §A4 (AFF).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1979–1990 · leading case: Union Trust Co. of Ellsworth v. Hardy, 400 A.2d 384 (Me. 1979).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Union Trust Co. of Ellsworth v. Hardy, 400 A.2d 384 (Me. 1979). “The *391 debtor’s point was that the description of the security interest fails to disclose the restriction set forth in 11 M.R.S.A. §§ 9-204(3) & (4)(b) whereby under an after-acquired property clause a security interest may not attach to “consumer goods other than accessions”…”
Wallingford's Inc. v. Waning (In Re Waning), 120 B.R. 607 (Bankr. D. Me. 1990). “A security interest cannot attach until there is an agreement that it attach, 11 M.R.S.A. § 9-204. It is not enforceable until there exists, inter alia, a signed security agreement.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 11, § 9-204(3) — 1 case
Union Trust Co. of Ellsworth v. Hardy, 400 A.2d 384 (Me. 1979). “The *391 debtor’s point was that the description of the security interest fails to disclose the restriction set forth in 11 M.R.S.A. §§ 9-204(3) & (4)(b) whereby under an after-acquired property clause a security interest may not attach to “consumer goods other than accessions”…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.