Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 17-A
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1322 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1977, c. 455, §3 (NEW). PL 1987, c. 157, §3 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 769, §A56 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 188 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 872, §5 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 924, §13 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 394 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 305, §1 (AMD). PL 2005, c. 447, §§2,3 (AMD). PL 2007, c. 684, Pt. D, §1 (AMD). PL 2007, c. 684, Pt. D, §3 (AFF). PL 2015, c. 346, §8 (AMD). PL 2019, c. 113, Pt. A, §1 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 1984–2016 · leading case: State of Maine v. Christopher T. Knight, 2016 ME 123 (Me. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State of Maine v. Christopher T. Knight, 2016 ME 123 (Me. 2016). · cites it 8× “[¶ 7] The court denied Knight’s Rule 35 motion, concluding that the road repair costs were compensable under the restitution statute as an “environmental clean-up expense,” 17-A M.R.S. § 1322(3)(C-1) (2015), and that the MSP was an authorized claimant, see 17-A M.”
State v. Beaudoin, 503 A.2d 1289 (Me. 1986). · cites it 3× “17-A M.R.S.A. § 1322(5) (1983) (emphasis added).”
State v. Hudson, 470 A.2d 786 (Me. 1984). · cites it 2× “17-A M.R.S.A. § 1322(3) (1983) defines “economic loss” as: [E]conomic detriment consisting only of allowable expense, work loss, replacement services loss and, if injury causes death, dependent’s economic loss, dependent’s replacement services loss and property loss.”
State v. Woods, 654 A.2d 960 (N.H. 1995). · cites it 2× “The draft is similar to the Maine statute then in effect, see Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 17-A, § 1322(5), (7) (West 1964) (current version at Me.”
State v. McMann, 541 N.W.2d 418 (Neb. Ct. App. 1995). “§ 18 -101h (West 1992) (defining restitution to include provision of services to victim); Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 17-A, § 1322 (West 1983) (defining restitution to include work or service provided to victim for economic loss); N.”
State v. Bouchard, 2005 ME 106 (Me. 2005). “” 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1322(3) (Supp.2004). [¶ 22] The amount of $14,631.”
State v. McCray, 1999 ME 151 (Me. 1999). · cites it 2× “" 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1322(5) (Supp.1998). "‘Victim’ means a government that suffers economic loss or a person who suffers personal injury, death or economic loss as a result of a crime .”
State v. McDonough, 2009 ME 39 (Me. 2009). “1986); 17-A M.R.S. §§ 1322(7), 1324 (2008) (limiting authorized claimants for restitution to victims, counties, persons providing recovery, and persons acting on behalf of victim).”
State v. Lane, 649 A.2d 1112 (Me. 1994). “In accord with 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1322(7), however, “[a] restitution order may encompass only economic loss caused to a victim by the crime for which a defendant is convicted.”
State v. Winslow, 556 A.2d 1093 (Me. 1989). “See 17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 1322, 1323 (Supp.1988); State v.”
State v. Libby, 556 A.2d 1099 (Me. 1989). “suffered economic loss and was a victim as defined in 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1322(7) (1983)). If the order was intended as restitution, it must be stricken as unauthorized.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1322(3) — 3 cases
State of Maine v. Christopher T. Knight, 2016 ME 123 (Me. 2016). “[¶ 7] The court denied Knight’s Rule 35 motion, concluding that the road repair costs were compensable under the restitution statute as an “environmental clean-up expense,” 17-A M.R.S. § 1322(3)(C-1) (2015), and that the MSP was an authorized claimant, see 17-A M.”
State v. Bouchard, 2005 ME 106 (Me. 2005). “” 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1322(3) (Supp.2004). [¶ 22] The amount of $14,631.”
State v. Hudson, 470 A.2d 786 (Me. 1984). “17-A M.R.S.A. § 1322(3) (1983) defines “economic loss” as: [E]conomic detriment consisting only of allowable expense, work loss, replacement services loss and, if injury causes death, dependent’s economic loss, dependent’s replacement services loss and property loss.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1322(3)(A) — 1 case
State v. Hudson, 470 A.2d 786 (Me. 1984). “17-A M.R.S.A. § 1322(3) (1983) defines “economic loss” as: [E]conomic detriment consisting only of allowable expense, work loss, replacement services loss and, if injury causes death, dependent’s economic loss, dependent’s replacement services loss and property loss.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1322(5) — 3 cases
State v. Woods, 654 A.2d 960 (N.H. 1995). “The draft is similar to the Maine statute then in effect, see Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 17-A, § 1322(5), (7) (West 1964) (current version at Me.”
State v. Beaudoin, 503 A.2d 1289 (Me. 1986). “17-A M.R.S.A. § 1322(5) (1983) (emphasis added).”
State v. McCray, 1999 ME 151 (Me. 1999). “" 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1322(5) (Supp.1998). "‘Victim’ means a government that suffers economic loss or a person who suffers personal injury, death or economic loss as a result of a crime .”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1322(7) — 6 cases
State of Maine v. Christopher T. Knight, 2016 ME 123 (Me. 2016). “[¶ 7] The court denied Knight’s Rule 35 motion, concluding that the road repair costs were compensable under the restitution statute as an “environmental clean-up expense,” 17-A M.R.S. § 1322(3)(C-1) (2015), and that the MSP was an authorized claimant, see 17-A M.”
State v. Beaudoin, 503 A.2d 1289 (Me. 1986). “17-A M.R.S.A. § 1322(5) (1983) (emphasis added).”
State v. McDonough, 2009 ME 39 (Me. 2009). “1986); 17-A M.R.S. §§ 1322(7), 1324 (2008) (limiting authorized claimants for restitution to victims, counties, persons providing recovery, and persons acting on behalf of victim).”
State v. Lane, 649 A.2d 1112 (Me. 1994). “In accord with 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1322(7), however, “[a] restitution order may encompass only economic loss caused to a victim by the crime for which a defendant is convicted.”
State v. McCray, 1999 ME 151 (Me. 1999). “" 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1322(5) (Supp.1998). "‘Victim’ means a government that suffers economic loss or a person who suffers personal injury, death or economic loss as a result of a crime .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.