Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 22
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 22, § 3741 (2026)

Aid to dependent children; promotion of economic self-support

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1965, c. 291 (AMD). PL 1967, c. 459, §1 (RPR). PL 1983, c. 849, §1 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 418, §A5 (RPR). PL 1997, c. 530, §A15 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1972–1993 · leading case: Maine Ass'n of Interdependent Neighborhoods v. Comm'r, Maine Dep't of Human Servs., 876 F.2d 1051 (1st Cir. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Maine Ass'n of Interdependent Neighborhoods v. Comm'r, Maine Dep't of Human Servs., 876 F.2d 1051 (1st Cir. 1989). · cites it 2× “” Although AFDC is administered by the state, see 22 M.R.S.A. § 3741, the state’s program must conform to federal statutes and regulations to remain eligible for federal funds.”
Westberry v. Fisher, 297 F. Supp. 1109 (D. Me. 1980). · cites it 3× “3 The State of Maine participates in this program, 22 M.R.S.A. § 3741 (Supp.1968-69), and as required by the Social Security Act, 42 U.”
Westberry v. Fisher, 309 F. Supp. 12 (D. Me. 1980). “It has been stipulated that defendant Fisher acted within the scope of his authority in promulgating the maximum budget regulation and in enforcing the maximum grant regulation promulgated by his predecessor.”
Anderson v. Comm'r of the Dep't of Human Servs., 489 A.2d 1094 (Me. 1985). “Maine participates in the AFDC program by virtue of 22 M.R.S.A. § 3741 (Supp.1984). See generally Littlefield v.”
Littlefield v. State, Dep't of Human Servs., 480 A.2d 731 (Me. 1984). “§ 602 (a)(1984)), as well as the State of Maine law (22 M.R.S.A. § 3741 (1980)), requires state compliance with the several requirements of the Social Security Law as amended and the federal regulations promulgated thereunder.”
Ottman v. Fisher, 319 A.2d 56 (Me. 1974). · cites it 2× “It is clear that Maine has adopted, through 22 M.R.S.A. § 3741, the same goals for its AFDC program as those adopted by Congress.”
Dickenson v. Petit, 536 F. Supp. 1100 (D. Me. 1982). “22 M.R.S.A. § 3741. If a state receives approval of its plan it can obtain reimbursements from the federal government for a percentage of the benefits paid and administrative expenses incurred.”
Maine Ass'n of Indep. Neighborhoods (M.A.I.N.) v. Comm'r, Maine Dep't of Human Servs., 697 F. Supp. 557 (D. Me. 1988). “See Me.Rev.Stat.Ann. tit. 22, §§ 3741 et seq.”
Curtis v. Comm'r of Human Servs., 507 A.2d 566 (Me. 1986). “See 22 M.R.S.A. § 3741 (Supp. 1985-1986); 42 U.”
Roy v. Comm'r, Dep't of Human Servs., 489 A.2d 499 (Me. 1985). “22 M.R.S.A. § 3741. Pursuant to that authority, DHS has promulgated the Maine Public Assistance Payment Manual (MPAPM) in conformity with Maine’s Administrative Procedure Act, 5 M.”
Levesque v. Sheehan, 821 F. Supp. 779 (D. Me. 1993). “22 M.R.S.A. § 3741 et seq. In order to participate in the AFDC program, a state must adopt a plan which complies with federal statutory requirements.”
United Low Income, Inc. v. Fisher, 340 F. Supp. 150 (D. Me. 1972). “22 M.R.S.A. § 3741. As required by the Act, 42 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.