Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 35, § 303 (2026)

Review of commission action

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1965, c. 91, §4 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 392, §2 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 663, §1 (RPR). PL 1987, c. 141, §A5 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 45 cases, 1967–1998 · leading case: Lewiston, Greene & Monmouth Tel. Co. v. New England Tel. & Tel. Co., 299 A.2d 895 (Me. 1973).
Lewiston, Greene & Monmouth Tel. Co. v. New England Tel. & Tel. Co., 299 A.2d 895 (Me. 1973). · cites it 7× “On June 22, 1972, purportedly pursuant to 35 M.R.S.A. § 303, 3 (hereinafter “Section 303”) New England filed a notice of “appeal” and thereafter took all appropriate steps to complete the record on appeal and to have the appeal docketed in the Law Court.”
New England Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 390 A.2d 8 (Me. 1978). · cites it 2× “9 million less than the income produced as a result of the previously approved rate.”
Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 405 A.2d 153 (Me. 1979). · cites it 3× “§ 305 (the § 305 complaint) filed November 2,1978 (see post), CMP and several intervenors filed appeals pursuant to 35 M.R.S.A. § 303 (the § 303 appeals) on or after November 9, 1978 with respect to the Commission’s Decree and Supplemental Orders.”
Mechanic Falls Water Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 381 A.2d 1080 (Me. 1977). · cites it 2× “1 Each company seeks review under 35 M.R.S.A. § 303 (§ 303) 2 and 35 M.R.S.”
Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Maine Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 395 A.2d 414 (Me. 1978). · cites it 3× “On October 25, 1977, the Superior Court dismissed CMP’s complaint and Bangor Hydro’s cross-claims for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because “35 M.R.S.A. §§ 303 and 305 grant exclusive jurisdiction over the subject matter to the Supreme Judicial Court.”
In Re the Pittston Co. Oil Refinery & Marine Terminal at Eastport, 375 A.2d 530 (Me. 1977). · cites it 4× “The section governing PUC appeals, 35 M.R.S.A. § 303, indicates that "[a]n appeal from a final decision of the commission may be taken to the law court.”
Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 455 A.2d 34 (Me. 1983). · cites it 2× “CMP, pursuant to 35 M.R.S.A. § 303 (1975), has appealed from both the Commission's Decision and Order and Supplemental Order No.”
Mars Hill & Blaine Water Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 397 A.2d 570 (Me. 1979). · cites it 2× “The Water Companies seasonably initiated the instant proceedings for judicial review by invoking this Court’s “appeal” jurisdiction under 35 M.R.S.A. § 303 1 and its “complaint” jurisdiction under 35 M.”
Ethyl Corp. v. Adams, 375 A.2d 1065 (Me. 1977). · cites it 2× “See : 35 M.R.S.A. § 303. [2] Even one authority who questions the utility of remand to the administrative agency, because of likelihood that the agency will merely re-rationalize the same result, concludes that the rule may well serve its purpose by improving future…”
New England Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 448 A.2d 272 (Me. 1982). “On appeal the company contended that such a *303 prospective ruling was erroneous under 35 M.R.S.A. § 303. This Court found the Commission’s prospective ruling to be a policy statement of what it intended to do in the future.”
Casco Bay Island Transit Dist. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 528 A.2d 448 (Me. 1987). · cites it 3× “Casco Bay Island Transit District (CBITD), a quasi-municipal entity providing ferry service between Portland and Long Island, appeals pursuant to 35 M.R.S.A. § 303(1) (Pamph.1986) from a decision of the Public Utilities Commission refusing to undertake a formal investigation at…”
Maine Pub. Serv. Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 524 A.2d 1222 (Me. 1987). · cites it 2× “1986) appeals from a decision handed down following an investigation by the Public Utilities Commission (Commission) finding that a merger of MPS and Central Maine Power Company (CMP) would be in the public interest and beneficial for MPS ratepayers.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 35, § 303(1) — 1 case
Casco Bay Island Transit Dist. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 528 A.2d 448 (Me. 1987). “Casco Bay Island Transit District (CBITD), a quasi-municipal entity providing ferry service between Portland and Long Island, appeals pursuant to 35 M.R.S.A. § 303(1) (Pamph.1986) from a decision of the Public Utilities Commission refusing to undertake a formal investigation at…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.