Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 35
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 35, § 305 (2026)

Additional court review

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1965, c. 91, §5 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 461 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 663, §3 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25 cases, 1970–1986 · leading case: New England Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 390 A.2d 8 (Me. 1978).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
New England Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 390 A.2d 8 (Me. 1978). · cites it 3× “9 million less than the income produced as a result of the previously approved rate. Not surprisingly the utility has appealed.”
Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 455 A.2d 34 (Me. 1983). · cites it 4× “In addition, CMP filed a Complaint with this Court pursuant to 35 M.R.S.A. § 305 (1977). On appeal, the Company challenges the Decision and Order, together with the Supplemental Order, and contends that the Commission erred in determining the cost of equity, the allowance for…”
Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 405 A.2d 153 (Me. 1979). · cites it 2× “In addition to its complaint pursuant to 35 M.R.S.A. § 305 (the § 305 complaint) filed November 2,1978 (see post), CMP and several intervenors filed appeals pursuant to 35 M.”
Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Maine Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 395 A.2d 414 (Me. 1978). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to 35 M.R.S.A. § 305, CMP also seeks direct review by complaint in the Law Court of Commission orders arising from the same proceedings.”
New England Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 362 A.2d 741 (Me. 1976). · cites it 2× “§ 303 (“Section 303”) and (2) its “complaint in equity” jurisdiction under 35 M.R.S.A. § 305 (“Section 305”). We sustain New England’s Section 303 appeal and remand the case to the Commission for further proceedings consistent *744 with our opinion herein.”
New England Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 376 A.2d 448 (Me. 1977). · cites it 2× “We have specially expedited our consideration and decision of an important, and potentially dispositive, issue raised in two complaints brought pursuant to 35 M.R.S.A. § 305 by New England Telephone and Telegraph Company (New England) against the Public Utilities Commission…”
Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Maine Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 436 A.2d 880 (Me. 1981). · cites it 2× “§ 303 and a complaint for review of the order as provided by 35 M.R.S.A. § 305. The Court ordered the two matters consolidated and subject to an expedited schedule for review pursuant to M.”
Lewiston, Greene & Monmouth Tel. Co. v. New England Tel. & Tel. Co., 299 A.2d 895 (Me. 1973). · cites it 3× “They arise because New England, in addition to its Section 303 “appeal” and likewise in June of 1972, filed a “complaint” in the Law Court to invoke the jurisdiction conferred by 35 M.R.S.A. § 305 (hereinafter “Section 305”).”
Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 382 A.2d 302 (Me. 1978). “Keyes Fibre Company has not instituted a complaint pursuant to 35 M.R.S.A. § 305 but seeks relief only by way of appeal under § 303.”
Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 458 A.2d 739 (Me. 1983). · cites it 2× “§ 303 and a complaint pursuant to 35 M.R.S.A. § 305, both brought by Central Maine Power Company to obtain review of a December 24, 1981, decision and order of the Public Utilities Commission, as supplemented by that agency.”
Maine Water Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 388 A.2d 493 (Me. 1978). “§ 303 (§ 303) and 35 M.R.S.A. § 305 (§ 305). Although we commend counsel for the principal parties for the quality and thoroughness of their briefs, the issues before us today have been resolved or extensively addressed in two recent decisions, Central Maine Power Co.”
First Hartford Corp. v. Cent. Maine Power Co., 425 A.2d 174 (Me. 1981). · cites it 2× “§ 303 and three days later, on September 24, 1979, filed a complaint with the Law Court pursuant to 35 M.R.S.A. § 305. By order, the Law Court consolidated the section 303 appeal and the section 305 complaint and directed that the action proceed on a single record.”
Show all 25 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.