Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 35-A, § 1101 (2026)

Authorization required

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
1.  Utilities to secure authorization from the commission.  A public utility must secure an order of authorization from the commission before it may:  
A. Sell, lease, assign, mortgage or otherwise dispose of or encumber the whole or part of its property that is necessary or useful in the performance of its duties to the public, or any part of its property under construction for the performance of its duties to the public, or its franchises, permits or rights under them;   [PL 1987, c. 490, Pt. B, §1 (AMD).]
B. Merge or consolidate its property, franchise or permits, or a part of them, with another public utility by any means, direct or indirect.   [PL 1987, c. 141, Pt. A, §6 (NEW).]
[PL 1987, c. 490, Pt. B, §1 (AMD).]
2.  Failure to secure commission authorization.  Every sale, lease, assignment, mortgage, disposition, encumbrance, merger or consolidation made other than in accordance with the order of the commission authorizing it is void.  
[PL 1987, c. 141, Pt. A, §6 (NEW).]
3.  Utilities exclusively outside the State.  Nothing in this section applies to property, franchises, permits or rights of a utility owned and operated exclusively outside the State, unless the property, franchise, permits or rights are owned, operated or under construction with respect to the performance of the utility's duties to the public inside this State.  
[PL 1987, c. 490, Pt. B, §2 (AMD).]
4.  Exempt transactions.  Transactions involving utility property that do not materially affect the ability of a utility to perform its duties to the public do not require commission authorization under this section. The commission may certify transactions as not requiring authorization, either by rule or order.  
[PL 1995, c. 357, §1 (NEW).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1987, c. 141, §A6 (NEW). PL 1987, c. 490, §§B1,B2 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 357, §1 (AMD).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1989–2016 · leading case: Bruce D. Taylor v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 2016 ME 71 (Me. 2016).
Bruce D. Taylor v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 2016 ME 71 (Me. 2016). · cites it 5× “§§ 702, 703 (2015), regarding special contracts; and 35-A M.R.S. § 1101 (2015), regarding leases.”
Standish Tel. Co. v. Saco River Tel. & Tel. Co., 555 A.2d 478 (Me. 1989). · cites it 2× “In 1919 and 1933, respectively, the legislature enacted the predecessors to 35-A M.R.S.A. §§ 1101 and 1104 (1988), that provided in pertinent part: Any public utility may henceforth sell, lease, assign, mortgage, or otherwise dispose of, or encumber the whole or any part of its…”
Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Town of Moscow, 649 A.2d 320 (Me. 1994). · cites it 2× “In support of its position, CMP points out that the PUC has statutory authority both to prevent a utility from selling any utility property "that is necessary or useful in the performance of [the utility's] duties to the public," 35-A M.R.S.A. § 1101(1)(A) (1988), and to prevent…”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 35-A, § 1101(1) — 1 case
Bruce D. Taylor v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 2016 ME 71 (Me. 2016). “§§ 702, 703 (2015), regarding special contracts; and 35-A M.R.S. § 1101 (2015), regarding leases.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 35-A, § 1101(1)(A) — 2 cases
Bruce D. Taylor v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 2016 ME 71 (Me. 2016). “§§ 702, 703 (2015), regarding special contracts; and 35-A M.R.S. § 1101 (2015), regarding leases.”
Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Town of Moscow, 649 A.2d 320 (Me. 1994). “In support of its position, CMP points out that the PUC has statutory authority both to prevent a utility from selling any utility property "that is necessary or useful in the performance of [the utility's] duties to the public," 35-A M.R.S.A. § 1101(1)(A) (1988), and to prevent…”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 35-A, § 1101(4) — 1 case
Bruce D. Taylor v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 2016 ME 71 (Me. 2016). “§§ 702, 703 (2015), regarding special contracts; and 35-A M.R.S. § 1101 (2015), regarding leases.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.