Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 35-A, § 301 (2026)

Safe facilities; just and reasonable rates

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
1.  Facilities.  Every public utility shall furnish safe, reasonable and adequate facilities and service.  
[PL 1987, c. 141, Pt. A, §6 (NEW).]
1-A.  Minimum service standards and report card for transmission and distribution utilities.  The commission shall adopt rules for utilities with over 50,000 customers in accordance with this subsection governing the evaluation of transmission and distribution utility service, which must take into account the specific characteristics of each utility and its service territory. Rules adopted pursuant to this subsection are routine technical rules as defined in Title 5, chapter 375, subchapter 2‑A.  
A. The rules must include specific, quantitative metrics pertaining to utility operations and activities relating to each of the following categories:  
(1) Service quality, including but not limited to reliability of service and timeliness of restoring service after outages;  
(2) Customer service, including but not limited to timeliness and accuracy of bills;  
(3) Field services, including but not limited to communication with and responsiveness to municipalities, businesses and individuals; and  
(4) Distributed energy resources interconnection.   [PL 2021, c. 702, §1 (NEW).]
B. The commission shall consider the cost impacts and benefits to ratepayers when establishing each service standard and metric pursuant to paragraph A and shall ensure that the performance of each service standard and metric may be measured using reliable and objective methods and information.   [PL 2021, c. 702, §1 (NEW).]
C. The commission shall set reporting requirements for each metric, including data specifications and reporting periods, adequate to track progress in areas of performance.   [PL 2021, c. 702, §1 (NEW).]
D. The commission shall designate service standards based on thresholds of performance.   [PL 2021, c. 702, §1 (NEW).]
E. For each service standard, the commission shall require quarterly filing of quantifiable data sufficient for the commission to calculate and publish a quantitative score for the service standard.   [PL 2021, c. 702, §1 (NEW).]
F. Annually, the commission shall evaluate the data provided by a transmission and distribution utility in accordance with paragraph E for the prior calendar year to determine if the standards established by the commission pursuant to this section have been met.   [PL 2021, c. 702, §1 (NEW).]
G. The commission shall impose administrative penalties for designated thresholds of poor performance for service standards in accordance with section 1508‑A, subsection 1, paragraph E unless the utility demonstrates good cause for its failure to meet the standard.   [PL 2021, c. 702, §1 (NEW).]
H. The commission shall publish quarterly reports containing scores for each service standard for each utility.   [PL 2021, c. 702, §1 (NEW).]
I. The commission may audit the data reported by a utility for each standard.   [PL 2021, c. 702, §1 (NEW).]
Nothing in this subsection prohibits the commission from establishing service quality standards for transmission and distribution utilities with fewer than 50,000 customers.  
[PL 2021, c. 702, §1 (NEW).]
2.  Rates.  The rate, toll or charge, or any joint rate made, exacted, demanded or collected by any public utility for production, transmission, delivery or furnishing of electricity, gas, heat or water; for communications service; or for transportation of persons or property within this State or for any service rendered or to be rendered in connection with any public utility, shall be just and reasonable.  
[PL 1987, c. 141, Pt. A, §6 (NEW).]
3.  Unreasonable rates prohibited.  Every unjust or unreasonable charge for public utility service is prohibited and declared unlawful.  
[PL 1987, c. 141, Pt. A, §6 (NEW).]
4.  Determining rates.  In determining just and reasonable rates, the commission:  
A. Shall provide such revenues to the utility as may be required to perform its public service and to attract necessary capital on just and reasonable terms; and   [PL 1987, c. 141, Pt. A, §6 (NEW).]
B. Shall, to a level within the commission's discretion, consider whether the utility is operating as efficiently as possible and is utilizing sound management practices, including the treatment in rates of executive compensation.   [PL 1993, c. 506, §1 (AMD).]
[PL 1993, c. 506, §1 (AMD).]
5.  Transmission and distribution utility report required; audits.  If the commission has not made a rate determination within the preceding 5 years for a transmission and distribution utility that serves more than 50,000 customers, the utility shall submit a report to the commission that includes a comparison of the utility's actual costs with cost estimates used in the utility's most recent rate case to set rates. Upon a finding of the commission that there was a difference of more than 10% between the transmission and distribution utility's actual costs and estimated costs, the commission may:  
A. Require an audit of the transmission and distribution utility in accordance with section 113; or   [PL 2021, c. 702, §2 (NEW).]
B. Disallow cost recovery in the transmission and distribution utility's future rate cases.   [PL 2021, c. 702, §2 (NEW).]
This subsection takes effect January 15, 2024.  
[PL 2021, c. 702, §2 (NEW).]
6.  Investor-owned transmission and distribution utility expenditures; comparison.  No later than November 1, 2022, the commission shall initiate a proceeding to conduct a detailed comparison of the annual expenditures of each investor-owned transmission and distribution utility in the State with the annual expenditures of other comparable investor-owned transmission and distribution utilities located in the United States. When conducting this analysis, the commission shall identify specific categories in which spending by an investor-owned transmission and distribution utility significantly deviated from those expenditures of comparable investor-owned transmission and distribution utilities. The commission may use the results of this analysis in future rate cases involving an investor-owned transmission and distribution utility. The commission may undertake a new comparison or update an existing one in accordance with this subsection at any time the commission determines is necessary. For purposes of this subsection, a comparable investor-owned transmission and distribution utility is one that provides electricity delivery in a service territory in a northern climate that is primarily wooded and includes urban and rural areas.  
[PL 2021, c. 702, §3 (NEW).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1987, c. 141, §A6 (NEW). PL 1987, c. 377 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 506, §1 (AMD). PL 2021, c. 702, §§1-3 (AMD).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1990–2023 · leading case: Pub. Advocate v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 1998 ME 218 (Me. 1998).
Pub. Advocate v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 1998 ME 218 (Me. 1998). · cites it 4× “" 35-A M.R.S.A. § 301(3), (4) (1988 & Supp.”
Off. of the Pub. Advocate v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 2015 ME 113 (Me. 2015). · cites it 3× “reasonable, conduct a revenue requirement and earnings review pursuant to the standards of [35-A M.R.S. § 301 (2014) ].” Id. In determining a just and reasonable rate base pursuant to section 301, the Commission must “provide such revenues to the utility as may be required to…”
Bruce D. Taylor v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 2016 ME 71 (Me. 2016). “, 35-A M.R.S. § 301(2) (2015) (“The rate, toll or charge, or any joint rate made, exacted, demanded or collected by any public utility for production, transmission, delivery or furnishing of electricity, gas, heat or water .”
Off. of Pub. Advocate v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 866 A.2d 851 (Me. 2005). · cites it 2× “See 35-A M.R.S.A. §§ 301, 7106, 7303-A, 7307 (1988 & Pamph.”
Quiland, Inc. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 917 A.2d 697 (Me. 2007). · cites it 2× “— Title 35-A M.R.S. § 301(2) (2006) directs that rates and charges for any public utility “shall be just and reasonable.”
Indus. Energy Consum. Grp. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 2001 ME 94 (Me. 2001). · cites it 4× “§ 3195 must, however, be read in concert with 35-A M.R.S.A. § 301. See supra note 2. Therefore, while the Commission may authorize ARPs, it must also ensure that the rates resulting from such plans are just and reasonable.”
Off. of the Pub. Advocate v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n et al., 2023 ME 77 (Me. 2023). · cites it 2× “” 35-A M.R.S. § 301(2). We have previously explained that this requirement encompasses “a range” rather than “a particular single rate” and held that “[i]t is within the sound discretion of the Commission” to fix 12 rates within that range.”
In Re E. Maine Elec. Coop., Inc., 121 B.R. 917 (Bankr. D. Me. 1990). “See 35-A M.R.S.A. § 301. The cooperative is governed by its members, who elect a board of directors at annual meetings.”
New England Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 1997 ME 222 (Me. 1997). “” 35-A M.R.S.A. § 301 (1988). • The Legislature has specifically provided that “it is the policy of the state that telephone service must continue to be universally affordable, especially to the poor at affordable rates,” 35-A M.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 35-A, § 301(2) — 3 cases
Bruce D. Taylor v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 2016 ME 71 (Me. 2016). “, 35-A M.R.S. § 301(2) (2015) (“The rate, toll or charge, or any joint rate made, exacted, demanded or collected by any public utility for production, transmission, delivery or furnishing of electricity, gas, heat or water .”
Quiland, Inc. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 917 A.2d 697 (Me. 2007). “— Title 35-A M.R.S. § 301(2) (2006) directs that rates and charges for any public utility “shall be just and reasonable.”
Off. of the Pub. Advocate v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n et al., 2023 ME 77 (Me. 2023). “” 35-A M.R.S. § 301(2). We have previously explained that this requirement encompasses “a range” rather than “a particular single rate” and held that “[i]t is within the sound discretion of the Commission” to fix 12 rates within that range.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 35-A, § 301(3) — 3 cases
Pub. Advocate v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 1998 ME 218 (Me. 1998). “" 35-A M.R.S.A. § 301(3), (4) (1988 & Supp.”
Quiland, Inc. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 917 A.2d 697 (Me. 2007). “— Title 35-A M.R.S. § 301(2) (2006) directs that rates and charges for any public utility “shall be just and reasonable.”
Off. of the Pub. Advocate v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n et al., 2023 ME 77 (Me. 2023). “” 35-A M.R.S. § 301(2). We have previously explained that this requirement encompasses “a range” rather than “a particular single rate” and held that “[i]t is within the sound discretion of the Commission” to fix 12 rates within that range.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 35-A, § 301(4) — 2 cases
Pub. Advocate v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 1998 ME 218 (Me. 1998). “" 35-A M.R.S.A. § 301(3), (4) (1988 & Supp.”
Off. of the Pub. Advocate v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 2015 ME 113 (Me. 2015). “reasonable, conduct a revenue requirement and earnings review pursuant to the standards of [35-A M.R.S. § 301 (2014) ].” Id. In determining a just and reasonable rate base pursuant to section 301, the Commission must “provide such revenues to the utility as may be required to…”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 35-A, § 301(4)(A) — 2 cases
Off. of the Pub. Advocate v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 2015 ME 113 (Me. 2015). “reasonable, conduct a revenue requirement and earnings review pursuant to the standards of [35-A M.R.S. § 301 (2014) ].” Id. In determining a just and reasonable rate base pursuant to section 301, the Commission must “provide such revenues to the utility as may be required to…”
Indus. Energy Consum. Grp. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 2001 ME 94 (Me. 2001). “§ 3195 must, however, be read in concert with 35-A M.R.S.A. § 301. See supra note 2. Therefore, while the Commission may authorize ARPs, it must also ensure that the rates resulting from such plans are just and reasonable.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 35-A, § 301(4)(B) — 1 case
Indus. Energy Consum. Grp. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 2001 ME 94 (Me. 2001). “§ 3195 must, however, be read in concert with 35-A M.R.S.A. § 301. See supra note 2. Therefore, while the Commission may authorize ARPs, it must also ensure that the rates resulting from such plans are just and reasonable.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.