Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 39
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39, § 99-C (2026)

Petition for reopening

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1981, c. 185 (NEW). PL 1983, c. 479, §23 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 885, §A7 (RP). PL 1991, c. 885, §§A9-11 (AFF).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1982–1994 · leading case: Dillingham v. Andover Wood Prods., Inc., 483 A.2d 1232 (Me. 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dillingham v. Andover Wood Prods., Inc., 483 A.2d 1232 (Me. 1984). · cites it 2× “" 39 M.R.S.A. § 99-C (Supp.1983). No such discovery was alleged or proven in the case at bar.”
Every v. Ne. Log Homes, Inc., 638 A.2d 709 (Me. 1994). “39 M.R.S.A. § 99-C (petition to reopen within 30 days on the grounds of newly discovered evidence).”
Canning v. State, 444 A.2d 387 (Me. 1982). “Newly enacted in 1981, 39 M.R.S.A. § 99-C (Supp.1981) for the first time gives the commission limited authority to reopen decisions for consideration of new evidence.”
Brian v. State Dep't of Conservation, 556 A.2d 1089 (Me. 1989). · cites it 2× “The employer also argues that the commissioner abused his discretion in denying the employer’s petitions to reopen and to annul the memorandum of payment and acceptance of the employee’s claim filed by the employer.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.