Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 9-A

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 9-A, § 6-201

Applicability

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
This Part applies to a person engaged in this State in entering into consumer credit transactions and to a person having an office or place of business in this State who takes assignments of or undertakes direct collection of payments from or enforcement of rights against debtors arising from these transactions. In addition, this Part applies to a person, wherever located, who takes assignments of or undertakes direct collection of payments from or enforcement of rights against debtors arising from a consumer credit transaction subject to this Title. This Part also applies to a person, other than a supervised financial organization, wherever located, who takes assignments of or undertakes direct collection of payments from or enforcement of rights against debtors arising from a consumer credit transaction subject to Article 9.   [PL 2005, c. 206, §2 (AMD).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1973, c. 762, §1 (NEW). PL 1979, c. 660, §10 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 70, §2 (AMD). PL 1997, c. 727, §B20 (AMD). PL 2001, c. 371, §5 (AMD). PL 2005, c. 206, §2 (AMD).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1981–1998 · leading case: Reagan v. Racal Mortgage, Inc.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Reagan v. Racal Mortgage, Inc. (1998) me “9-AM.R.S.A. § 6-201 Historical and Statutory Notes (1997).”
United States v. Maine (1981) med “It applies to all entities engaged in “the extension of consumer credit transactions” in the State of Maine, 9-A M.R.S.A. § 6-201, and hence does not discriminate against federal credit unions.”
United States v. State of Me. (1981) med “It applies to all entities engaged in "the extension of consumer credit transactions" in the State of Maine, 9-A M.R.S.A. § 6-201, and hence does not discriminate against federal credit unions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.