green
Positive treatment
1.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1901 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1901
1963
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Phillips
See Hill v. Eldridge, 126 Mass. 234 , and cases cited; also Commonwealth v. Stevenson, 142 Mass. 466 . 3.
Henry Hill & another
v.
William T. Eldridge
v.
William T. Eldridge
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.
Jan 28, 1879.
L. H. Babcook, for the plaintiff., B. D. Washburn, for the defendant, was not called upon.
Cited by 21 opinions | Published
This case does not present the question whether a person can be permitted to testify to the precise day of his birth. It is quite clear that one may testify, from his own knowledge of himself, whether he was twenty-one or sixteen years of age at a certain time, (which was the only material point upon which the testimony of the defendant appears to have been admitted,) and that such weight may be given to his testimony as the court or the jury trying the case may think it entitled to receive. See Cheever v. Congdon, 34 Mich. 296; Watson v. Brewster, 1 Penn. St. 381, 383; State v. Cain, 9 W. Va. 559, 570.
Exceptions overruled.