Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 119A, § 1

Child support enforcement program; public policy; remedies; commission established; department of revenue as IV–D agency

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 1. It is the public policy of the commonwealth that dependent children shall be maintained, as completely as possible, from the resources of their parents, thereby relieving or avoiding, at least in part, the burden borne by the citizens of the commonwealth. It is hereby declared to be against the public policy of the commonwealth for a court of competent jurisdiction to enforce an agreement between parents if enforcement of the agreement prevents an adjustment or modification of a child support obligation when such adjustment or modification is required to ensure that the allocation of parental resources continues to be fair and reasonable and in the best interests of the child. The existing remedies pertaining to the support of dependent children are to be augmented by the additional remedies provided in this chapter so as to establish a comprehensive and effective child support enforcement program through expedited processes for obtaining, modifying and enforcing child support orders, including orders for health care coverage, and establishing paternity. This chapter shall be liberally construed to effectuate the policy stated herein.

There is hereby established within the executive office for administration and finance, the child support enforcement commission. Said commission shall consist of six members who shall be the secretary of the executive office for administration and finance who shall serve as chairman, the commissioner of revenue, the attorney general, the chief justice of the trial court, the commissioner of public welfare and a district attorney who shall be designated by the governor. Said commission shall monitor the child support enforcement system of the commonwealth and shall, from time to time, advise the IV–D agency and other agencies of the commonwealth, including the appropriate divisions of the trial court department, in matters for the improvement of the child support enforcement system of the commonwealth.

The department of revenue shall be the single state agency within the commonwealth that is designated the IV–D agency pursuant to Title IV, Part D of the Social Security Act and hereinafter in this chapter shall be referred to as the IV–D agency. The commissioner of revenue shall establish a division of child support enforcement which shall be provided, subject to appropriation, with such resources as may be necessary to implement the provisions of this chapter. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to limit the authority of the commissioner to delegate to the IV–D agency any child support enforcement powers or duties assigned to him under any provision of law. Said commissioner may promulgate regulations for the effective administration of the child support enforcement program.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 26 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1994–2025 · leading case: Rosen v. Rosen
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rosen v. Rosen (2016) massappct · cites it 4× “As a participating State, Massachusetts has enacted G. L. c. 119A, §§ 1 et seq., which “provides for child support enforcement services in accordance with the provisions of [the CSEA].”
L.W.K. v. E.R.C. (2000) mass · cites it 5× “” G. L. c. 119A, § 1, as amended through St.”
Department of Revenue v. C.M.J. (2000) mass · cites it 4× “The judge reasoned that the child support order was “in-line with the public policy expressed by G. L. c. 119A, § 1, that children shall be maintained from the resources of their parents, thereby relieving the burden borne by the citizens of the Commonwealth.”
Adoption of Marlene (2005) mass · cites it 2× “, G. L. c. 119A, § 1; G. L. c. 208, § 28; G.”
White v. Laingor (2001) mass · cites it 2× “208, § 28 (“A modification of child support may enter notwithstanding an agreement of the parents that has independent legal significance”); G. L. c. 119A, § 1 (against public policy of commonwealth for court of competent jurisdiction to enforce agreement between parents if…”
Eccleston v. Bankosky (2003) mass · cites it 2× “16 Statutes providing for postminority support advance the Legislature’s purposes to maintain children “as *437 completely as possible” from parental resources, see G. L. c. 119A, § 1, to protect minor children of nonintact families from parental “underinvestment,” see note 16,…”
T.F. v. B.L. (2004) mass “” G. L. c. 119A, § 1. G. L. c. 209C, § 9 (c).”
Department of Revenue v. Mason M. (2003) mass “See G. L. c. 119A, § 1; G. L. c. 209C, § 9 (c).”
Woodward v. Commissioner of Social Security (2002) mass “See G. L. c. 119A, § 1 (“It is the public policy of this commonwealth that dependent children shall be maintained, as completely as possible, from the resources of their parents, thereby relieving or avoiding, at least in part, the burden borne by the citizens of the…”
Boulter-Hedley v. Boulter (1999) mass “See G. L. c. 119A, §§ 1, 13 (c); G. L. c. 208, § 28; Child Support Guidelines.”
Naranjo v. Department of Revenue (2005) massappct · cites it 2× “The DOR is the “IV-D agency” that under G. L. c. 119A, §§ 1 and 2, is charged with enforcement of child support orders.”
Lombardi v. Lombardi (2007) massappct “” G. L. c. 119A, § 1, inserted by St. 1987, c.”
Show all 26 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.