Heath v. Gloster, 246 N.W. 494 (Mich. 1932). · Go Syfert
Heath v. Gloster, 246 N.W. 494 (Mich. 1932). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Heath
v.
Gloster.
Docket No. 8, Calendar No. 36,486..
Michigan Supreme Court.
Sep 16, 1932.
246 N.W. 494
George B. Murphy , for plaintiff. Arthur Gloster , for defendant. ON PETITION FOR REHEARING.
PER CURIAM..
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The petition for rehearing in the case of Heath v. Gloster,260 Mich. 85, a law action, is denied. Dirr v. Hitchman,260 Mich. 179, is an equity suit involving the equitable claims of the respective parties. These we cannot consider on appeal in a law action where there has been a notice of forfeiture of an executory land contract, followed, after fair trial, by valid judgment for restitution duly entered both by the circuit court commissioner, and, on appeal, by the circuit court.