Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 103 / Act 215 of 1895

Mich. Comp. Laws § 103.1

Sidewalks; control; grading; construction, maintenance.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE FOURTH CLASS CITY ACT


Act 215 of 1895


103.1 Sidewalks; control; grading; construction, maintenance.

Sec. 1.

    The city council shall have control of all sidewalks in the public streets and alleys of the city, and may prescribe the grade thereof, and change the same when deemed necessary. They shall have power to build, maintain and keep in repair sidewalks and crosswalks in the public streets and alleys, and to charge the expense of constructing and maintaining such sidewalks upon the lots and premises adjacent to and abutting upon such walks.

History: 1895, Act 215, Eff. Aug. 30, 1895 ;-- CL 1897, 3187 ;-- CL 1915, 3101 ;-- CL 1929, 2025 ;-- CL 1948, 103.1

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1971–2018 · leading case: Gibson v. Neelis
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Gibson v. Neelis (1998) michctapp · cites it 4× “1, amending BOCA, § 103.1 (emphasis added).] The parties do not dispute that defendant’s building was an existing structure before the effective date of enforcement.”
Mote v. City of Chelsea (2018) mied · cites it 2× “12, a county road, even if it served as a "funding conduit" for work done under the County's authority; (2) MDOT is not responsible for constructing or maintaining sidewalks, even if they run along a state road, because municipalities are responsible for building and maintaining…”
In Re Stewart (2003) mieb “Keith Lundin, Chapter 13 Bankruptcy § 103.1 at 103-1 (3d ed.2000)(footnote omitted).”
Sharkey v. City of Petoskey (1971) michctapp · cites it 2× “MCLA §103.1 (Stat Ann 1949 Rev § 5.1820), provides: “The city council shall have control of all sidewalks in the public streets and alleys of the city, and may prescribe the grade thereof, and change the same when deemed necessary.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.