MICHIGAN ZONING ENABLING ACT
Act 110 of 2006
125.3306 Recommendations of zoning commission; submission to legislative body; public hearing; notice; examination of proposed text and maps.
Sec. 306.
(1) Before submitting its recommendations for a proposed zoning ordinance to the legislative body, the zoning commission shall hold at least 1 public hearing. Notice of the time and place of the public hearing shall be given in the same manner as required under section 103(1) for the initial adoption of a zoning ordinance or section 202 for any other subsequent zoning text or map amendments.
(2) Notice of the time and place of the public hearing shall also be given by mail to each electric, gas, and pipeline public utility company, each telecommunication service provider, each railroad operating within the district or zone affected, and the airport manager of each airport, that registers its name and mailing address with the clerk of the legislative body for the purpose of receiving the notice of public hearing.
(3) The notices required under this section shall include the places and times at which the proposed text and any maps of the zoning ordinance may be examined.
History: 2006, Act 110, Eff. July 1, 2006
Notes of Decisions
Prime-Site Media, LLC v. City of Oak Park (E.D. Mich. 2020).
· cites it 8× “) Prime-Site argued that a provision of Michigan’s Zoning Enabling Act, Mich. Comp. Laws § 125.3306 (1), and a provision of the City’s own zoning ordinance, City of Oak Park, Mich.”
Lisa Montrief v. MacOn Twp. Bd. of Trs. (Mich. Ct. App. 2025).
· cites it 3× “] The airport, however, points to no evidence in the record that the meeting of the Township Board in question was a public hearing, nor that the airport manager was registered and entitled to notice under MCL 125.3306. Because the airport made no factual allegations and…”
Prime-Site Media, LLC v. City of Oak Park (E.D. Mich. 2020).
· cites it 2× “” Mich. Comp. Laws § 125.3306 . And, says Prime-Site, Oak Park’s own laws require a hearing: “The planning commission shall make no decision except in a specific case and after requiring hearing, if applicable.”
David Hoffman v. Porter Twp. (Mich. Ct. App. 2015).
“It is unclear from defendant’s -6- directed to hold at least one public hearing, MCL 125.3306, and to adopt and file with the township board its recommendations for a zoning plan, for the establishment of boundaries of zoning districts, and for the text of a zoning ordinance.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 125.3306(1) — 1 case
Prime-Site Media, LLC v. City of Oak Park (E.D. Mich. 2020).
“) Prime-Site argued that a provision of Michigan’s Zoning Enabling Act, Mich. Comp. Laws § 125.3306 (1), and a provision of the City’s own zoning ordinance, City of Oak Park, Mich.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 125.3306(2) — 1 case
Lisa Montrief v. MacOn Twp. Bd. of Trs. (Mich. Ct. App. 2025).
“] The airport, however, points to no evidence in the record that the meeting of the Township Board in question was a public hearing, nor that the airport manager was registered and entitled to notice under MCL 125.3306. Because the airport made no factual allegations and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.