Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 125 / Act 110 of 2006
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 125.3607 (2026)

Party aggrieved by order, determination, or decision; circuit court review; proper party.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN ZONING ENABLING ACT


Act 110 of 2006


125.3607 Party aggrieved by order, determination, or decision; circuit court review; proper party.

Sec. 607.

    (1) Any party aggrieved by any order, determination, or decision of any officer, agency, board, commission, zoning board of appeals, or legislative body of any local unit of government made under section 208 may obtain a review in the circuit court for the county in which the property is located. The review shall be in accordance with section 606.

    (2) Any person required to be given notice under section 604(4) of the appeal of any order, determination, or decision made under section 208 shall be a proper party to any action for review under this section.

History: 2006, Act 110, Eff. July 1, 2006

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2014–2022 · leading case: Julie E Visser Trust v. City of Wyoming (Mich. Ct. App. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Julie E Visser Trust v. City of Wyoming (Mich. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “3208, contrary to plaintiff’s arguments, MCL 125.3607 is inapplicable. The MZEA also provides a means to challenge a decision made by a zoning board of appeals (ZBA).”
Woodcreek of Ann Arbor Ass'n v. City of Ann Arbor (Mich. Ct. App. 2019). “Servitto /s/ James Robert Redford 1 For instance, MCL 125.3607 governs an appeal of a legislative body’s decision related to noncomforming uses or structures, see MCL 125.”
Saugatuck Dunes Coastal All. v. Saugatuck Twp. (Mich. 2022). “3603 to MCL 125.3607. At issue in this matter is the standard for a party to show that it has been “aggrieved” by a decision of a planning commission or zoning board of appeals for purposes of appealing those decisions under MCL 125.”
Saugatuck Dunes Coastal All. v. Saugatuck Twp. (Mich. 2022). “3603 to MCL 125.3607. At issue in this matter is the standard for a party to show that it has been “aggrieved” by a decision of a planning commission or zoning board of appeals for purposes of appealing those decisions under MCL 125.”
Saugatuck Dunes Coastal All. v. Saugatuck Twp. (Mich. 2022). “3603 to MCL 125.3607. At issue in this matter is the standard for a party to show that it has been “aggrieved” by a decision of a planning commission or zoning board of appeals for purposes of appealing those decisions under MCL 125.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 125.3607(1) — 1 case
Julie E Visser Trust v. City of Wyoming (Mich. Ct. App. 2014). “3208, contrary to plaintiff’s arguments, MCL 125.3607 is inapplicable. The MZEA also provides a means to challenge a decision made by a zoning board of appeals (ZBA).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.