Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 15 / Act 469 of 1980

Mich. Comp. Laws § 15.369

Short title.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE WHISTLEBLOWERS' PROTECTION ACT


Act 469 of 1980


15.369 Short title.

Sec. 9.

    This act shall be known and may be cited as "the whistleblowers' protection act".

History: 1980, Act 469, Eff. Mar. 31, 1981

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (13 in the last 5 years), 2020–2026 · leading case: Laura Green v. County of Grand Traverse
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Laura Green v. County of Grand Traverse (2020) michctapp “On May 2, 2017, Green initiated this action by filing a three-count complaint against the County, asserting that she was unlawfully terminated under the Whistleblower’s Protection Act (WPA), MCL 15.369 et seq. However, because she alleged that she was terminated for…”
Paula Sova v. Advisacare Healthcare Solutions Inc (2021) michctapp “Sova filed suit under the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act (WPA), MCL 15.369 et seq., alleging that AHS actually retaliated against her for filing a report with the state about the abuse of a client.”
20221229_C360380_53_360380.Opn.Pdf (2022) michctapp “On October 18, 2019, Robinson filed suit against defendants,3 raising a claim under the WPA, MCL 15.369 et seq. Robinson alleged that she engaged in protected activity when she reported time fraud and sexual harassment to Captain Tucker and other defendants, and that the 10-day…”
Teresa Karsney v. City of Burton (2023) michctapp “116(C)(10) on plaintiff’s claim for retaliatory discharge under the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act (WPA), MCL 15.369 et seq. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND Defendant city of Burton (the City) hired plaintiff as city clerk in October 2013.”
James Stefanski v. Saginaw County 911 Communications Center Auth (2024) michctapp “a report of gross negligence by a fellow employee) is an activity protected under the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act (WPA), MCL 15.369 et seq. For the reasons stated in this opinion, we affirm.”
C1 James Stefanski v. Saginaw County 911 Communications Center Auth (2024) michctapp “362 provides: An employer shall not discharge, threaten, or otherwise discriminate against an employee regarding the employee’s compensation, terms, conditions, location, or privileges of employment because the employee, or a person acting on behalf of the employee, reports or…”
20240307_C363459_39_363459.Opn.Pdf (2024) michctapp “116(C)(10) of her complaint alleging that defendants violated the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act (WPA), MCL 15.369 et seq., and engaged in a civil conspiracy.”
Charles Locklear v. Oakland Schools (2024) michctapp “Plaintiff argues that summary disposition of several of his claims was improper because genuine issues of material fact exist regarding (1) whether there was just cause to terminate his employment contract, (2) whether he was terminated in violation of the Whistleblowers’…”
20241219_C368783_26_368783.Opn.Pdf (2024) michctapp “However, plaintiff maintains that defendant used an exaggerated business reason as a pretext for unlawful retaliation for his reports regarding the -1- tires.”
20250225_C366932_55_366932.Opn.Pdf (2025) michctapp “Plaintiff brought his lawsuit against defendants asserting violations of the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act (WPA), MCL 15.369 et seq., as well as “public-policy” violations, claiming that his termination was retaliatory in nature.”
Kimberly Johnson v. City of Detroit (2025) michctapp “116(C)(10) and dismissing her claims for violation of the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act (WPA), MCL 15.369 et seq., violation of the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act (ELCRA), MCL 37.”
Thomas D Esordi v. MacOmb Township (2025) michctapp “Plaintiff also appeals the trial court’s previous order granting defendants summary disposition of plaintiff’s breach-of-contract and public policy-based retaliation claims.”
Show all 14 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.