Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 205 / Act 186 of 1973

Mich. Comp. Laws § 205.707

Provisions effective.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

TAX TRIBUNAL ACT


Act 186 of 1973


205.707 Provisions effective.

Sec. 7.

    The provisions of this act are effective nothwithstanding the provisions of any statute, charter, or law to the contrary.

History: 1973, Act 186, Eff. July 1, 1974

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1977–2022 · leading case: Wikman v. City of Novi
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wikman v. City of Novi (1982) mich · cites it 4× “[31] If the provisions of the Tax Tribunal Act were intended to supersede these express limitation periods, the Tax Tribunal Act does not clearly indicate such an intention.”
In Re the Wayne County Treasurer for Foreclosure (2009) michctapp “” MCL 205.707. Nevertheless, statutes sharing a common purpose must be read in pari materia and we must give every word or *112 phrase in them some meaning while avoiding conflict, if at all possible.”
Edros Corp. v. City of Port Huron (1977) michctapp “A city council acting pursuant to such a charter provision, therefore, is a "board, official or administrative agency” empowered to make a decision subject to review by the tribunal. In addition, the Legislature, by expressly providing that the terms of the act are effective…”
State Treasurer v. Eaton (1979) michctapp “MCL 205.707; MSA 7.650(7). One apparent legislative purpose of vesting the tax tribunal with such broad authority over property tax assessment questions was to assure that tax contests would be resolved in the first instance by an expert body.”
Richland Township v. State Tax Commission (1995) michctapp “731; MSA 7.650(31)], shall proceed only before the tribunal.”
Queen Airmotive, Inc v. Department of Treasury (1981) michctapp “MCL 205.707; MSA 7.650(7). 5 Defendant’s appeal to this Court does not in any manner concern the merits of the use tax assessment.”
Wells Fargo Rail Corp v. State of Michigan (2022) michctapp · cites it 3× “731 relates to the jurisdiction of the MTT and provides: The tribunal has exclusive and original jurisdiction over all of the following: (a) A proceeding for direct review of a final decision, finding, ruling, determination, or order of an agency relating to assessment,…”
Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. China Township (1982) michctapp “MCL 205.707; MSA 7.650(7). The tribunal has original and exclusive jurisdiction over all agency decisions relating to assessment.”
in Re Petition of Kalamazoo County Treasurer for Foreclosure (2018) michctapp “” MCL 205.707. This Court addressed the interaction of the provisions governing the jurisdiction of the circuit courts and the Tax Tribunal in Wayne Co, 286 Mich App 108 .”
in Re Petition of Kalamazoo County Treasurer for Foreclosure (2018) michctapp “” MCL 205.707. This Court addressed the interaction of the provisions governing the jurisdiction of the circuit courts and the Tax Tribunal in Wayne Co, 286 Mich App 108 .”
Centerpoint Owner LLC v. City of Grand Rapids (2019) michctapp “” MCL 205.707. The Tax Tribunal “is a quasi-judicial agency.”
in Re Petition of Isabella County Treasurer (2015) michctapp “” MCL 205.707. Under MCL 211.78k(2) & (3), the circuit court has authority to hear any challenge to the validity or correctness of a property’s unpaid taxes if that property is listed in a petition for tax foreclosure.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.