Mich. Comp. Laws § 207.505

Exemptions.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX


Act 134 of 1966


207.505 Exemptions.

Sec. 5.

    The following instruments and transfers shall be exempt from this act:

    (a) Instruments where the value of the consideration is less than $100.00.

    (b) Instruments evidencing contracts or transfers which are not to be performed wholly within this state insofar as such instruments include land lying outside of this state.

    (c) Written instruments which this state is prohibited from taxing under the constitution or statutes of the United States.

    (d) Instruments or writings given as security or any assignment or discharge thereof.

    (e) Instruments evidencing leases, including oil and gas leases, or transfers of such leasehold interests.

    (f) Instruments evidencing any interests which are assessable as personal property.

    (g) Instruments evidencing the transfer of rights and interests for underground gas storage purposes.

    (h) Instruments (i) in which the grantor is the United States, the state, any political subdivision or municipality thereof, or officer thereof acting in his official capacity; (ii) given in foreclosure or in lieu of foreclosure of a loan made, guaranteed or insured by the United States, the state, any political subdivision or municipality thereof or officer thereof acting in his official capacity; (iii) given to the United States, the state, or 1 of their officers as grantee, pursuant to the terms or guarantee or insurance of a loan guaranteed or insured by the grantee.

    (i) Conveyances from a husband or wife or husband and wife creating or disjoining a tenancy by the entireties in the grantors or the grantor and his or her spouse.

    (j) Judgments or orders of courts of record making or ordering transfers, except where a specific monetary consideration is specified or ordered by the court therefor.

    (k) Instruments used to straighten boundary lines where no monetary consideration is given.

    (l) Instruments to confirm titles already vested in grantees, such as quitclaim deeds to correct flaws in titles.

    (m) Land contracts whereby the legal title does not pass to the grantee until the total consideration specified in the contract has been paid.

    (n) Instruments evidencing the transfer of mineral rights and interests.

    (o) Instruments creating a joint tenancy between 2 or more persons where at least 1 of the persons already owned the property.

History: 1966, Act 134, Eff. Jan. 1, 1968 ;-- Am. 1967, Act 258, Imd. Eff. July 19, 1967 ;-- Am. 1968, Act 327, Imd. Eff. July 3, 1968 ;-- Am. 1969, Act 67, Imd. Eff. July 21, 1969

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2011–2026 · leading case: Eastbrook Homes, Inc. v. Department of Treasury
Eastbrook Homes, Inc. v. Department of Treasury (2012) michctapp · cites it 2× “A closing would also occur where petitioner would “release its security and quit claim title back to the Buyer.”
United States v. Porath (2011) mied · cites it 3× “See Mich. Comp. Laws § 207.505 (a). Georgina acknowledged that she had not seen the quit claim deed until her deposition in this case held on May 29, 2008.”
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Ass'n v. Kelley (2014) michctapp “526(h)(i) provide tax exemptions for certain instruments and transactions involving the United States, Freddie Mac is specifically authorized by federal statute to be exempt from “all taxation now or hereafter imposed by any... State,” except for real property taxes.”
John McLaughlin v. Chase Home Finance LLC (2013) ca6 “This argument fails because assignments of mortgages are exempt from transfer taxes under MCL §§ 207.505(d) and 207.526(d). I. Assignment of Note Finally, the McLaughlins argue that Chase is precluded from foreclosing upon the Mortgage because it assigned the Note to an unknown…”
In re: Gary Lee Brohl, Jr. v. Pretty Michigan Homes, LLC, & Dylan Tanaka (2026) mieb · cites it 6× “conveying title to PMH, PMH executed another quitclaim deed (the “Corrective Quitclaim Deed”) which specifically states that: “This deed is given to confirm title already vested in grantee and accordingly is exempt pursuant to MCL 207.505(l) and MCL 207.526(n).”6 See Amended…”
Gold v. Wall, Sr. (2024) mieb · cites it 3× “”19 On the 2020 Quit Claim Deed, the Defendants claimed an exemption for the 2020 Transfer from the “Real Estate Transfer Tax” under Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 207.505 (a) and 207.526(a).”
County of Genesee v. Greenstone Farm Credit Services, ACA (2013) mied · cites it 4× “” Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 207.505 (c), 207.526(c).”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 207.505(a) — 2 cases
United States v. Porath (2011) mied “See Mich. Comp. Laws § 207.505 (a). Georgina acknowledged that she had not seen the quit claim deed until her deposition in this case held on May 29, 2008.”
Gold v. Wall, Sr. (2024) mieb “”19 On the 2020 Quit Claim Deed, the Defendants claimed an exemption for the 2020 Transfer from the “Real Estate Transfer Tax” under Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 207.505 (a) and 207.526(a).”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 207.505(d) — 2 cases
Eastbrook Homes, Inc. v. Department of Treasury (2012) michctapp “A closing would also occur where petitioner would “release its security and quit claim title back to the Buyer.”
John McLaughlin v. Chase Home Finance LLC (2013) ca6 “This argument fails because assignments of mortgages are exempt from transfer taxes under MCL §§ 207.505(d) and 207.526(d). I. Assignment of Note Finally, the McLaughlins argue that Chase is precluded from foreclosing upon the Mortgage because it assigned the Note to an unknown…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 207.505(h)(i) — 1 case
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Ass'n v. Kelley (2014) michctapp “526(h)(i) provide tax exemptions for certain instruments and transactions involving the United States, Freddie Mac is specifically authorized by federal statute to be exempt from “all taxation now or hereafter imposed by any... State,” except for real property taxes.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 207.505(l) — 1 case
In re: Gary Lee Brohl, Jr. v. Pretty Michigan Homes, LLC, & Dylan Tanaka (2026) mieb “conveying title to PMH, PMH executed another quitclaim deed (the “Corrective Quitclaim Deed”) which specifically states that: “This deed is given to confirm title already vested in grantee and accordingly is exempt pursuant to MCL 207.505(l) and MCL 207.526(n).”6 See Amended…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.