Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 207 / Act 330 of 1993

Mich. Comp. Laws § 207.521

Short title.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

STATE REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX ACT


Act 330 of 1993


207.521 Short title.

Sec. 1.

    This act shall be known and may be cited as the "state real estate transfer tax act".

History: 1993, Act 330, Eff. Apr. 1, 1994

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 2006–2015 · leading case: Oakland County v. Federal Housing Finance Agency
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Oakland County v. Federal Housing Finance Agency (2012) mied · cites it 3× “BACKGROUND This case involves the Enterprises’ claimed exemption from the Michigan State Real Estate Transfer Tax, MCL § 207.521 et seq., and the County Real Estate Transfer Tax, MCL § 207.”
Eastbrook Homes, Inc. v. Department of Treasury (2012) michctapp “(petitioner), for taxes, penalties, and interest due under the State Real Estate Transfer Tax Act (SRETTA), MCL 207.521 et seq., in the amount of $1,039,854.”
Liem Ngo v. Department of Treasury (2015) mich “523 of the State Real Estate Transfer Tax Act (SRETTA), MCL 207.521 et seq., and then requested a refund from respondent, the Department of Treasury, under MCL 207.”
Lake Forest Partners 2, Inc v. Department of Treasury (2006) michctapp · cites it 4× “Petitioner appeals as of right the judgment of Tax Tribunal affirming respondent's assessment under the State Real Estate Transfer Tax Act (SRETTA), MCL 207.521 et seq. This case addresses the propriety of assessments under the SRETTA for purchase agreements that include both…”
Lake Forest Partners 2, Inc. v. Dept. of Treasury (2008) mich “The State Real Estate Transfer Tax Act, MCL 207.521, et seq., taxes recorded instruments.”
County of Oakland v. Federal Housing Finance Agency (2013) “The Michigan State Real Estate Transfer Tax, Mich. Comp. Laws § 207.521 , et seq., and the Michigan County Real Estate Transfer Tax, Mich.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.