Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 24.302 (2026)

Judicial review; method.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ACT OF 1969


Act 306 of 1969


24.302 Judicial review; method.

Sec. 102.

    Judicial review of a final decision or order in a contested case shall be by any applicable special statutory review proceeding in any court specified by statute and in accordance with the general court rules. In the absence or inadequacy thereof, judicial review shall be by a petition for review in accordance with sections 103 to 105.

History: 1969, Act 306, Eff. July 1, 1970 ;-- Am. 1970, Act 40, Imd. Eff. July 1, 1970

PopularName Notes:

Act 306

PopularName Notes:

APA
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 29 cases, 1972–2010 · leading case: Wikman v. City of Novi, 322 N.W.2d 103 (Mich. 1982).
Wikman v. City of Novi, 322 N.W.2d 103 (Mich. 1982). · cites it 8× “[17] Const 1963, art 6, § 28 provides in part: "In the absence of fraud, error of law or the adoption of wrong principles, no appeal may be taken to any court from any final agency provided for the administration of property tax laws from any decision relating to valuation or…”
Wayne Cnty. v. Michigan State Tax Comm'n, 682 N.W.2d 100 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “306 of the Public Acts of 1969, as amended, being section 24.302 of the Michigan Compiled Laws, and in accordance with the Michigan court rules, an appeal from the tribunal’s decision shall be by right to the court of appeals.”
Greenfield Constr. Co. v. Dep't of State Highways, 261 N.W.2d 718 (Mich. 1978). · cites it 2× “" MCLA 24.302; MSA 3.560(202). [43] "A petition for review shall be filed in the circuit court of the county where petitioner resides or has his principal place of business in this state, or in the circuit court for Ingham county.”
Hagen v. Dep't of Educ., 427 N.W.2d 879 (Mich. 1988). · cites it 2× “[3] Nestell v Bridgeport-Spaulding Bd of Ed, 138 Mich App 401, 404 ; 360 NW2d 200 (1984), clarified that judicial review of a tenure commission decision is properly sought under MCL 24.302; MSA 3.560(202), since the teacher tenure act does not specifically provide for judicial…”
Nw. Nat'l Cas. Co. v. Comm'r of Ins., 586 N.W.2d 563 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “Review is to be sought by filing a petition for review, MCL 24.302; MSA 3.560(202), in the cir *496 cuit court, MCL 24.”
People v. Young, 559 N.W.2d 670 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “§ 24.302; M.S.A. § 3.560(202) allows for judicial review of a final decision or order in a contested case.”
CAF Inv. Co. v. Saginaw Twp., 262 N.W.2d 863 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 2× “306 of the Public Acts of 1969, as amended, being section 24.302 of the Michigan Compiled Laws, and in accordance with general court rules, an appeal from the tribunal’s decision shall be by right to the court of appeals.”
Soto v. Dir. of the Michigan Dep't of Soc. Servs., 251 N.W.2d 292 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). “” MCLA 24.302; MSA 3.560(202). Therefore, if the Social Welfare Act (MCLA 400.”
Bunn v. Liquor Control Comm'n, 335 N.W.2d 913 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “, MCL 24.302; MSA 3.560(202), as well as MCL 24.”
Ins. Inst. v. Comm'r of the Off. of Fin. & Ins. Servs., 761 N.W.2d 184 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 6× “[MCL 24.302]. Except as provided in subsection (2), a petition for review shall be filed in the circuit court for the county where petitioner resides or has his or her principal place of business in this state, or in the circuit court for Ingham county.”
Anglers of the Ausable, Inc v. Dep't of Env't Quality, 488 Mich. 69 (Mich. 2010). · cites it 2× “92 MCL 24.302. 37 contested case decision, the circuit court concluded that the DEQ’s “approval of Merit’s COC is illegal .”
Jackson Cmty. Coll. v. Dep't of Treasury, 621 N.W.2d 707 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000). “See also MCL 24.302; MSA 3.560(202) and MCL 600.631; MSA 27A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.