Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 285.69 (2026)

Application for license or renewal; financial statement.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

GRAIN DEALERS ACT


Act 141 of 1939


285.69 Application for license or renewal; financial statement.

Sec. 9.

    (1) A grain dealer shall include with an application for a license or renewal a financial statement for the grain dealer's most recent completed fiscal year. The financial statement shall be a reviewed or audited financial statement, prepared by a certified public accountant in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The end of the grain dealer's most recent completed fiscal year shall be within 6 months of the expiration date of the grain dealer's current license. The financial statement shall include at least all of the following:

    (a) An accountant's report, a balance sheet, an income statement, and notes and disclosures.

    (b) A statement of the grain dealer's allowable net assets for purposes of section 3.

    (c) A statement from the certified public accountant that he or she acknowledges that the department is relying on the financial statement in determining whether the grain dealer meets the allowable net asset requirement under section 3(3).

    (2) If a financial statement described in subsection (1) discloses that the grain dealer during the preceding fiscal year had a current asset to current liability ratio of less than 1 to 1, the licensee shall include with the application a plan and timetable to increase the current asset to current liability ratio to 1 to 1 or more.

    (3) If a financial statement described in subsection (1) is a financial statement of the licensee's parent corporation or a consolidated financial statement of the licensee and its parent corporation, the application shall include a declaration of liability signed by an authorized representative of the parent corporation, by which the parent corporation assumes all financial obligations incurred by the licensee during the term of the license.

History: 1939, Act 141, Eff. Sept. 29, 1939 ;-- CL 1948, 285.69 ;-- Am. 1963, Act 180, Eff. Sept. 6, 1963 ;-- Am. 1976, Act 259, Imd. Eff. Aug. 12, 1976 ;-- Am. 1979, Act 206, Imd. Eff. Jan. 8, 1980 ;-- Am. 2002, Act 80, Eff. Mar. 31, 2003 ;-- Am. 2016, Act 263, Eff. Sept. 26, 2016

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1967–1989 · leading case: Pickler v. Durand Milling Co. (In Re Durand Milling Co.), 9 B.R. 669 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1981).
Pickler v. Durand Milling Co. (In Re Durand Milling Co.), 9 B.R. 669 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1981). · cites it 3× “§ 285.69. Therefore, the plaintiffs are to be treated as the holders of non-negotiable warehouse receipts for the amounts and types of grain indicated on the weight slips.”
La Bair v. Mayville Feed & Grain, Inc. (In Re Mayville Feed & Grain, Inc.), 96 B.R. 755 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1989). · cites it 9× “The plaintiffs failed to obtain warehouse receipts from the debtor on the forms dictated for such purposes by the Department of Agriculture pursuant to the directives of the Michigan Grain Dealers Act, Mich. Comp.Laws § 285.69; Mich.Stat.Ann. § 12.”
United States v. Haddix & Sons, Inc., 268 F. Supp. 825 (E.D. Mich. 1967). “Laws 1948, § 285.69, demands that every warehouse receipt furnish information on ten points, including several likely to be considered largely insignificant by the average farmer, e.”
Simon v. Eichstadt Bros. (In Re Biniecki Bros.), 38 B.R. 519 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1984). “§ 285.69(1) requires that “upon delivery of farm produce for storage by a person to a grain dealer licensed under this Act, the grain dealer within 30 days after delivery shall deliver to the owner of the farm produce stored a warehouse receipt .”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 285.69(1) — 3 cases
Pickler v. Durand Milling Co. (In Re Durand Milling Co.), 9 B.R. 669 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1981). “§ 285.69. Therefore, the plaintiffs are to be treated as the holders of non-negotiable warehouse receipts for the amounts and types of grain indicated on the weight slips.”
La Bair v. Mayville Feed & Grain, Inc. (In Re Mayville Feed & Grain, Inc.), 96 B.R. 755 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1989). “The plaintiffs failed to obtain warehouse receipts from the debtor on the forms dictated for such purposes by the Department of Agriculture pursuant to the directives of the Michigan Grain Dealers Act, Mich. Comp.Laws § 285.69; Mich.Stat.Ann. § 12.”
Simon v. Eichstadt Bros. (In Re Biniecki Bros.), 38 B.R. 519 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1984). “§ 285.69(1) requires that “upon delivery of farm produce for storage by a person to a grain dealer licensed under this Act, the grain dealer within 30 days after delivery shall deliver to the owner of the farm produce stored a warehouse receipt .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.