Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 285 / Act 141 of 1939
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 285.69a (2026)

Repealed. 2002, Act 80, Eff. Mar. 31, 2003.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

GRAIN DEALERS ACT


Act 141 of 1939


285.69a Repealed. 2002, Act 80, Eff. Mar. 31, 2003.

    Repealed. 2002, Act 80, Eff. Mar. 31, 2003.

Compiler's Notes:

    The repealed section pertained to price later agreements.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1984–1989 · leading case: La Bair v. Mayville Feed & Grain, Inc. (In Re Mayville Feed & Grain, Inc.), 96 B.R. 755 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
La Bair v. Mayville Feed & Grain, Inc. (In Re Mayville Feed & Grain, Inc.), 96 B.R. 755 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1989). · cites it 3× “Mich.Comp.Laws § 285.69a. 5 . Although "a long-standing interpretation of a statute by the agency which administers it is entitled to great weight [it] does not control when the interpretation is clearly wrong.”
Simon v. Eichstadt Bros. (In Re Biniecki Bros.), 38 B.R. 519 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1984). “§ 285.69a(l) requires that “if farm produce which is received by a grain dealer is not received pursuant to a bailment or a cash sale, the grain dealer, not more than 30 days after receipt, shall pro *522 vide the grower or owner of the farm produce with a price later agreement.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 285.69a(l) — 2 cases
Simon v. Eichstadt Bros. (In Re Biniecki Bros.), 38 B.R. 519 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1984). “§ 285.69a(l) requires that “if farm produce which is received by a grain dealer is not received pursuant to a bailment or a cash sale, the grain dealer, not more than 30 days after receipt, shall pro *522 vide the grower or owner of the farm produce with a price later agreement.”
La Bair v. Mayville Feed & Grain, Inc. (In Re Mayville Feed & Grain, Inc.), 96 B.R. 755 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1989). “Mich.Comp.Laws § 285.69a. 5 . Although "a long-standing interpretation of a statute by the agency which administers it is entitled to great weight [it] does not control when the interpretation is clearly wrong.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.