Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 324.61502 (2026)

Construction of part.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT


Act 451 of 1994


324.61502 Construction of part.

Sec. 61502.

    It has long been the declared policy of this state to foster conservation of natural resources so that our citizens may continue to enjoy the fruits and profits of those resources. Failure to adopt such a policy in the pioneer days of the state permitted the unwarranted slaughter and removal of magnificent timber abounding in the state, which resulted in an immeasurable loss and waste. In an effort to replace some of this loss, millions of dollars have been spent in reforestation, which could have been saved had the original timber been removed under proper conditions. In past years extensive deposits of oil and gas have been discovered that have added greatly to the natural wealth of the state and if properly conserved can bring added prosperity for many years in the future to our farmers and landowners, as well as to those engaged in the exploration and development of this great natural resource. The interests of the people demand that exploitation and waste of oil and gas be prevented so that the history of the loss of timber may not be repeated. It is accordingly the declared policy of the state to protect the interests of its citizens and landowners from unwarranted waste of gas and oil and to foster the development of the industry along the most favorable conditions and with a view to the ultimate recovery of the maximum production of these natural products. To that end, this part is to be construed liberally to give effect to sound policies of conservation and the prevention of waste and exploitation.

History: Add. 1995, Act 57, Imd. Eff. May 24, 1995

PopularName Notes:

Act 451

PopularName Notes:

NREPA

PopularName Notes:

Supervisor of Wells
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1999–2014 · leading case: Alcona Cnty. v. Wolverine Env't Prod., Inc., 590 N.W.2d 586 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999).
Alcona Cnty. v. Wolverine Env't Prod., Inc., 590 N.W.2d 586 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999). “” MCL 324.61502; MSA 13A.61502. We find no language here limiting the authority of the supervisor of wells only to the “well site,” but instead the supervisor of wells is granted authority over waste to soil and water in all “oil and gas operations.”
Schmude Oil, Inc. v. Dep't of Env't Quality, 856 N.W.2d 84 (Mich. Ct. App. 2014). “Failure to adopt such a policy in the pioneer days of the state permitted the unwarranted slaughter and removal of magnificent timber abounding in the state, which resulted in an immeasurable loss and waste.”
Rorke v. Savoy Energy, LP, 677 N.W.2d 45 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004). “In the face of Michigan’s strong policy *257 against waste, see MCL 324.61502, MCL 324.61504, and MCL 324.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.