Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 333 / Act 368 of 1978
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 333.1222 (2026)

Renewals; distribution of work; pro rata fee; waiver.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PUBLIC HEALTH CODE


Act 368 of 1978


333.1222 Renewals; distribution of work; pro rata fee; waiver.

Sec. 1222.

    (1)  In order to distribute the work of renewals in the interests of administrative efficiency, the appropriate state agency may:

    (a) Schedule expirations established under section 16194 or otherwise under law to spread them over each year of a biennium or longer term.

    (b) Issue initial licenses in the interim during a normal term to expire on the next normal expiration date or the first normal expiration date thereafter, and prorate the fees therefor.

    (2) The issuing agency shall collect, before a renewal is issued under section 1221 or this section, a pro rata fee for the period of the extension granted under section 1221 or this section. However, to save administrative costs, the agency may waive this fee for an extension of not more than 2 months.

History: 1978, Act 368, Eff. Sept. 30, 1978

PopularName Notes:

Act 368
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2011–2011 · leading case: Mason Cnty. v. Dep't of Cmty. Health, 820 N.W.2d 192 (Mich. Ct. App. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mason Cnty. v. Dep't of Cmty. Health, 820 N.W.2d 192 (Mich. Ct. App. 2011). “” MCL 333.1222(1). As a result, 2 /3 of board members who are appointed by plaintiffs are interested in the provision of mental health services and have no loyalty to cause them to prefer plaintiffs over WMCMHS.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 333.1222(1) — 1 case
Mason Cnty. v. Dep't of Cmty. Health, 820 N.W.2d 192 (Mich. Ct. App. 2011). “” MCL 333.1222(1). As a result, 2 /3 of board members who are appointed by plaintiffs are interested in the provision of mental health services and have no loyalty to cause them to prefer plaintiffs over WMCMHS.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.