Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 35.402 (2026)

Veterans; removal, suspension or transfer from public employment; notice, hearing; protest, waiver; reinstatement, compensation.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PREFERENCE IN EMPLOYMENT


Act 205 of 1897


35.402 Veterans; removal, suspension or transfer from public employment; notice, hearing; protest, waiver; reinstatement, compensation.

Sec. 2.

    No veteran or other soldier, sailor, marine, nurse or member of women's auxiliaries as indicated in the preceding section holding an office or employment in any public department or public works of the state or any county, city or township or village of the state, except heads of departments, members of commissions, and boards and heads of institutions appointed by the governor and officers appointed directly by the mayor of a city under the provisions of a charter, and first deputies of such heads of departments, heads of institutions and officers, shall be removed or suspended, or shall, without his consent, be transferred from such office or employment except for official misconduct, habitual, serious or willful neglect in the performance of duty, extortion, conviction of intoxication, conviction of felony, or incompetency; and such veteran shall not be removed, transferred or suspended for any cause above enumerated from any office or employment, except after a full hearing before the governor of the state if a state employee, or before the prosecuting attorney if a county employee, or before the mayor of any city or the president of any village, or before the commission of any such city or village operating under a commission form of government, if an employee of a city or village, or before the township board if a township employee, and at such hearing the veteran shall have the right to be present and be represented by counsel and defend himself against such charges: Provided further, That as a condition precedent to the removal, transfer, or suspension of such veteran, he shall be entitled to a notice in writing stating the cause or causes of removal, transfer, or suspension at least 15 days prior to the hearing above provided for, and such removal, suspension or transfer shall be made only upon written order of the governor, the prosecuting attorney, the mayor, commission, or the township board: Provided, however, That where such veteran has been removed, transferred, or suspended other than in accordance with the provisions of this act, he shall file a written protest with the officer whose duty under the provisions of this act it is to make the removal, transfer, or suspension, within 30 days from the day such veteran is removed, transferred, or suspended; otherwise the veteran shall be deemed to have waived the benefits and privileges of this act: Provided, however, Said hearing shall be held within 30 days of filing such notice: Provided further, That the mayor of any city or the president of any village or the commission of any such city or village operating under a commission form of government may refer any protest where a veteran is removed, transferred, suspended or discharged, to the legal department of such city or village for a hearing. The legal department shall act as a fact finding body and shall have the power to examine witnesses, administer oaths and do all those things which the mayor could do hereunder: Provided further, That the findings shall be transmitted to the mayor in writing by the legal department, whereupon the mayor shall examine the transcript of the hearing and make a decision based on the transcript thereof: And provided further, That where such veteran has been reinstated to his employment upon the written order of the governor of the state if a state employee, the prosecuting attorney if a county employee, the mayor of any city or the president of any village or the commission of any such city or village operating under a commission form of government, or a township board if a township employee, or by an order of any court of competent jurisdiction, then such veteran shall be entitled to receive compensation for the time lost from date of such dismissal or suspension to the date of reinstatement at the same rate of pay received by him at the date of dismissal or suspension.

History: 1897, Act 205, Eff. Aug. 30, 1897 ;-- CL 1897, 1691 ;-- Am. 1899, Act 85, Imd. Eff. May 25, 1899 ;-- Am. 1907, Act 329, Eff. Sept. 28, 1907 ;-- CL 1915, 1042 ;-- Am. 1919, Act 224, Eff. Aug. 14, 1919 ;-- CL 1929, 901 ;-- Am. 1931, Act 67, Imd. Eff. May 5, 1931 ;-- Am. 1939, Act 298, Eff. Sept. 29, 1939 ;-- Am. 1944, 1st Ex. Sess., Act 22, Imd. Eff. Feb. 29, 1944 ;-- CL 1948, 35.402 ;-- Am. 1955, Act 32, Imd. Eff. Apr. 19, 1955

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 34 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1949–2025 · leading case: Charles Vayda v. Cnty. of Lake, 909 N.W.2d 874 (Mich. Ct. App. 2017).
Charles Vayda v. Cnty. of Lake, 909 N.W.2d 874 (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 11× “, and MCL 35.402 of the veterans preference act (VPA), MCL 35.”
Sherrod v. City of Detroit, 625 N.W.2d 437 (Mich. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 12× “[MCL 35.402; MSA 4.1222.] The quoted language does not support defendants' argument.”
Leelanau Cnty. Sheriff v. Kiessel, 824 N.W.2d 576 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 9× “70, deputies serve at a sheriffs pleasure. We hold, for the reasons discussed hereafter, that the VPA does authorize the PA to review the sheriffs discharge of Kiessel and, if appropriate, to order his “reinstatement at the same rate of pay received by him at the date of…”
Larry M. Young v. Twp. of Green Oak, 471 F.3d 674 (6th Cir. 2006). · cites it 3× “See Mich. Comp. Laws § 35.402 (2001) (“No veteran .”
In Re Grant, 645 N.W.2d 79 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 6× “” MCL 35.402. This section further provides that, at least fifteen days before the pretermination hearing, the veteran must be given written notice of both the cause for removal and the fact that the veteran can only be removed on written order of the board after a full hearing…”
Jackson v. Detroit Police Chief, 506 N.W.2d 251 (Mich. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 4× “[MCL 35.402; MSA 4.1222.] The only veterans employed by state and local governments who are not protected by the vpa are department heads, members of commissions and boards, heads of institutions appointed by the governor, officers appointed by a city’s mayor under the city’s…”
Bajis v. City of Dearborn, 391 N.W.2d 401 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “Section 2 of the act, MCL 35.402; MSA 4.1222, refers to any veteran holding an office or employment in any public department or public works of a city.”
Lenz v. Mayor of Detroit, 73 N.W.2d 285 (Mich. 1955). · cites it 4× “CL 1948, § 35.402 et seq. (Stat Ann 1952 Rev § 4.1222 et seq.”
Lenz v. Mayor of Detroit, 61 N.W.2d 587 (Mich. 1953). · cites it 2× ““Department of City Clerk By /s/ Ernest Jones Deputy City Clerk” On December 14,1949, plaintiff sent a letter to the then mayor of the city of Detroit requesting a hearing-under the veterans’ preference act, CL 1948, § 35.402 et seq. (Stat Ann § 4.1222 et seq.”
Ingham Cnty. Employees' Ass'n v. Ingham Circuit Court, 428 N.W.2d 7 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “MCL 35.402; MSA 4.1222 entitles veterans removed from public employment to back pay only in situations where they are reinstated.”
Krajewski v. City of Royal Oak, 337 N.W.2d 635 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “After a hearing pursuant to MCL 35.402; MSA 4.1222, plaintiff was discharged from his job as a laborer for "official misconduct”.”
Beadling v. Governor of Michigan, 308 N.W.2d 269 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981). “2 MCL 35.402; MSA 4.1222 provides in part: "No veteran or other soldier, sailor, marine, nurse or member of women’s auxiliaries as indicated in the preceding section holding, an office or employment in any public department or public works of the state * * * shall be removed or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.