Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 408.403 (2026)

Invalidating provisions of preceding section as misdemeanor; penalty; prosecution.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

LEGAL DAY'S WORK


Act 137 of 1885


408.403 Invalidating provisions of preceding section as misdemeanor; penalty; prosecution.

Sec. 3.

    Any individual, firm, agent of any corporation, or other employers of labor who shall take any unlawful advantage of any person or persons in their employ, or seeking employment, because of their poverty or misfortune, to invalidate any of the provisions of the preceding section, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not less than $5.00, nor more than $50.00 for each offense, and it shall be the duty of the prosecuting attorney of the county in which such offense was committed, upon receiving complaint, to prosecute all such cases in the name of the people of the state of Michigan.

History: 1885, Act 137, Eff. Sept. 19, 1885 ;-- How. 1997a-7 ;-- CL 1897, 5455 ;-- CL 1915, 5589 ;-- CL 1929, 8488 ;-- CL 1948, 408.403 ;-- Am. 1990, Act 223, Imd. Eff. Oct. 8, 1990

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2018–2018 · leading case: Ramos v. Intercare Cmty. Health Network, 916 N.W.2d 287 (Mich. Ct. App. 2018).
Ramos v. Intercare Cmty. Health Network, 916 N.W.2d 287 (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “MCL 408.403(1) does not refer to "another" or "a different" employee; it refers to "an employee.”
Joel Ramos v. Intercare Cmty. Health Network (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “MCL 408.403(1) does not refer to “another” or “a different” employee; it refers to “an employee.”
Joel Ramos v. Intercare Cmty. Health Network (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “MCL 408.403(1) does not refer to “another” or “a different” employee; it refers to “an employee.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 408.403(1) — 3 cases
Ramos v. Intercare Cmty. Health Network, 916 N.W.2d 287 (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “MCL 408.403(1) does not refer to "another" or "a different" employee; it refers to "an employee.”
Joel Ramos v. Intercare Cmty. Health Network (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “MCL 408.403(1) does not refer to “another” or “a different” employee; it refers to “an employee.”
Joel Ramos v. Intercare Cmty. Health Network (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “MCL 408.403(1) does not refer to “another” or “a different” employee; it refers to “an employee.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.